Cited by 8Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Gastrointestinal motility and disordersArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Explainable multi-modal deep learning with cross-modal attention for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation using abdominal X-ray images and symptom questionnaire

Open access
Sangnark, Sirapob, Rattanachaisit, Pakkapon, Patcharatrakul, Tanisa, Vateekul, Peerapon·2024·IEEE Access

Abstract

Dyssynergic defecation (DD) is a type of functional constipation that requires a specialized test for diagnosis. However, these tests are only accessible in tertiary care because they require devices that are not available elsewhere. In this work, we present explainable multi-modal deep learning models that can pre-screen patients with DD, using affordable data accessible in small hospitals i.e. abdominal X-ray images and symptom questionnaires; the output classifies whether DD is present or not. To enhance the model’s performance, we apply cross-modal attention to help the model find meaningful interactions between the two modalities. A convolution block attention module (CBAM) is added to obtain more important semantic and spatial features from the images. Masking augmentation is implemented to ignore irrelevant backgrounds in images. Both explainable AI techniques like gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) and deep shapley additive explanations (DeepSHAP) are also used to explain the important parts of images and the symptom data for each patient. In our experiments, all models are run on 3 patient-based bootstraps. Our model is compared with single-modal models and human experts. Results demonstrate that our multi-modal model outperforms the single-modal model and achieves the highest in terms of sensitivity, specificity, F1, and accuracy (87.37%, 77.01%, 82.17%, and 82.27%), respectively. In addition, our model outperforms human experts, which shows its ability to assist human experts in diagnosing DD. This model is a novel clinical tool that combines symptom and image data for a more accurate diagnosis of DD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2024.3409077

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some papers studied in this review attempt to incorporate unimodal explainable AI methods, like Shapley values and Grad-CAM.

    “Some papers studied in this review indeed attempt to incorporate (unimodal) explainable AI methods, like Shapley values (Kolk et al., 2024; Sangnark et al., 2024; Teuho et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2022a; Parvin et al., 2024) and Grad-CAM (Sangnark et al., 2024; Teuho et al., 2024).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sangnark, S., Rattanachaisit, P., Patcharatrakul, T., & Vateekul, P.
Affiliations
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
  • Thai Red Cross Society (TH)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2024
Volume
12
Pages
78132-78147
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399282649
Cited by
8
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Research Council of Thailand (N42A640330)
  • Rachadapiseksompoch Fund for the Center of Excellence in Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
dyssynergic defecation, functional constipation, symptom questionnaire, multimodal deep learning, cross-modal attention, convolution block attention module, Grad-CAM, DeepSHAP, explainable AI, prescreening, diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review