Cited by 95Information and Cyber SecurityAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

Applications of LLMs for Generating Cyber Security Exercise Scenarios

Open access
Mudassar Yamin, Muhammad, Hashmi, Ehtesham, Ullah, Mohib, Katt, Basel·2024·IEEE Access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract This study proposes a novel approach leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate dynamic and complex adaptable cybersecu-rity exercise scenarios. Motivated by Turing’s sem-inal exploration into machine cognition, which questions the ability of machines to mimic human thought and intelligence. By exploiting the generative potential of LLMs, our methodology simulates a wide range of cyber threats, both known and novel, thereby enhancing cybersecurity training and awareness. This approach transforms the potential for ’hal-lucination’ inherent in LLMs into a potential advantage , enabling the creation of complex exercise scenarios that push the boundaries of traditional cybersecurity training. The innovation lies in the sophisticated application of AI, aiming to advance the preparedness of security professionals against diverse cyber threats. The scenarios generated through this method were subject to meticulous testing and a rigorous evaluation process involving GPT models and expert review to ensure their realism and applicability. Furthermore, the prompts provided to the LLMs were meticulously designed to adopt a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) approach, enriching the complexity and relevance of the scenarios. This incorporation of RAG, alongside the inspiration drawn from Tur-ing’s exploration of machine intelligence, showcases an advanced application of AI in cybersecurity training , reflecting a deep understanding of how machines can augment our capabilities to anticipate and mitigate cyber threats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2024.3468914

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]8. R. Beuran, D. Tang, C. Pham, K.-i. Chinen, Y. Tan, and Y. Shinoda, 'Integrated framework for handson cybersecurity training: Cytrone,' Computers & Security , vol. 78, pp. 43-59, 2018.
  2. [31]31. Z. CHen, L. Cao, S. Madden, J. Fan, N. Tang, Z. Gu, Z. Shang, C. Liu, M. Cafarella, and T. Kraska, 'Seed: Simple, efficient, and effective data management via large language models,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00749 , 2023. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mudassar Yamin, M., Hashmi, E., Ullah, M., & Katt, B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Information Security and Communication Technology (IIK), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Gjøvik, Norway
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2024
Volume
12
Pages
143806-143822
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402892453
Cited by
91
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 13
FWCI
34.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Norwegian Research Council through the ASCERT Project 3290
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
large language models, scenario generation, cybersecurity training, GPT, retrieval-augmented generation, hallucinations, Turing test, machine intelligence, security awareness, prompt engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review