Cited by 7Muscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

A Study on Lower Limb Movement Intention Recognition Based on Multi-Source Information Fusion

Open access
Zong, Siyu, Li, Wei, Sun, Dawen, Wei, Xiaojie, Chen, Junjie, Yue, Zhengwei, Sun, Daxue·2025·IEEE Access

Abstract

In order to enhance the suppleness of a lower limb rehabilitation medical robot during the re-habilitation process, this study proposes a multi-source information fusion lower limb motion intention recognition method based on surface electromyographic signals (sEMG) and lower limb joint angles. To solve the problem of data traffic surge during the collection process, a multi-source current limiting sliding time window algorithm (MLS) is proposed. The MLS algorithm controls the data flow through a flow limiting and sliding time window mechanism to ensure the efficiency and stability of the system in handling large data volumes. On this basis, the study combines the Back Propagation Generalized Algorithm Neural-network (BPGN) to construct a prediction model for lower limb joint angles. The experimental results show that under the same conditions of the algorithm, the fusion of multi-source information reduces the average error of knee joint angle prediction by 10.8° and the average error of ankle joint angle prediction by 7.2° compared with the method using a single lower limb joint angle signal. Under the same condition of input signal, the multivariate flow-limiting sliding time-window BPGN reduced the average knee joint error by 13.6° and the average ankle joint angle error by 8.5° compared to the BPGN intent recognition. The multivariate flow-limited sliding time window BPGN reduced the mean knee error by 11.2° and the mean ankle angle error by 7.4° compared to Radial Basis Function (RBF) Neural-network intent recognition. By integrating the sEMG signal and lower limb joint angle information, the system can more accurately capture the patient’s movement intention and realize more precise lower limb rehabilitation training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2024.3521510

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zong, S., Li, W., Sun, D., Wei, X., Chen, J., Yue, Z., & Sun, D.
Affiliations
  • Changchun University (CN)
  • Sellafield (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Shandong JITE Industrial Technology Company Ltd., Rizhao, Shandong, China
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2025
Volume
13
Pages
5032-5041
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405718116
Cited by
7
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Jilin Development and Reform Commission 2023 Budgeted Capital Funding (2023C043)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
lower limb rehabilitation robot, movement intention recognition, multi-source data fusion, surface electromyography, joint angle prediction, knee joint angle, ankle joint angle, rehabilitation training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review