Cited by 20Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsMuscle activation and electromyography studiesStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Design and Control of a Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robot Based on Human Motion Intention Recognition with Multi-Source Sensor Information

Open access
Zhang, Pengfei, Gao, Xueshan, Miao, Mingda, Zhao, Peng·2022·Machines

Abstract

The research on rehabilitation robots is gradually moving toward combining human intention recognition with control strategies to stimulate user involvement. In order to enhance the interactive performance between the robot and the human body, we propose a machine-learning-based human motion intention recognition algorithm using sensor information such as force, displacement and wheel speed. The proposed system uses the bi-directional long short-term memory (BILSTM) algorithm to recognize actions such as falling, walking, and turning, of which the accuracy rate has reached 99.61%. In addition, a radial basis function neural network adaptive sliding mode controller (RBFNNASMC) is proposed to track and control the patient’s behavioral intention and the gait of the lower limb exoskeleton and to adjust the weights of the RBF network using the adaptive law. This can achieve a dynamic estimation of the human–robot interaction forces and external disturbances, and it gives the exoskeleton joint motor a suitable driving torque. The stability of the controller is demonstrated using the Lyapunov stability theory. Finally, the experimental results demonstrate that the BILSTM classifier has more accurate recognition than the conventional classifier, and the real-time performance can meet the demand of the control cycle. Meanwhile, the RBFNNASMC controller has a better gait tracking effect compared with the PID controller.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/machines10121125

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, P., Gao, X., Miao, M., & Zhao, P.
Affiliations
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Pengfei
Venue
Machines
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-11-28
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
1125
ISSN
2075-1702 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310154854
Cited by
20
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Machines (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Province Key R&D Program of Guangxi (AB22035006, 2020YFC2008503)
  • National Key R&D Program of China (AB22035006, 2020YFC2008503)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
lower limb rehabilitation robot, lower limb exoskeleton, radial basis function neural network, adaptive sliding mode control, gait monitoring, sensor fusion, Lyapunov stability, real-time control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review