Cited by 37Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsBig Data and Business Intelligence

Retail Resilience Engine: An Agentic AI Framework for Building Reliable Retail Systems With Test-Driven Development Approach

Open access
Mishra, Lalit Narayan, Senapati, Biswaranjan·2025·IEEE Access

Abstract

System reliability and operational resilience are two critical success factors in the retail industry that are directly connected to customer satisfaction and business sustainability. Staying competitive in today’s dynamic and rapidly evolving market requires rapid adaptability. However, it contradicts the reliability and resilience. This paper proposes an innovative solution, the Retail Resilience Engine (RRE), to establish a balance between these success factors and market demand. It is a unique framework that combines Test-Driven Development (TDD) with a Large Language Model (LLM). This framework follows the state-of-the-art Agentic-AI architecture. It effectively evaluates the decision-making process at rapid speed in retail by incorporating diverse factors, including inventory management, demand forecasting, and customer feedback. As a result, the system reliability is improved significantly. The experimental analysis of the proposed framework shows its decision-making is similar to human experts with a similarity index of 97.5%. It further proves the reliability of the system. The framework also scales effectively, maintaining high accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores across varying dataset sizes. The robustness analysis of the system demonstrates the agility enhancement across diverse retail domains, ensuring consistent performance with accuracy exceeding 90% across all tested scenarios. The integration of a creative filtering mechanism further enhances the performance of the RRE framework by preventing 98.2% of the irrelevant inputs. Overall, the proposed RRE framework demonstrates the impressive potential to transform retail systems by enhancing reliability, scalability, and decision-making quality through an Agentic-AI approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2025.3552592

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishra, L. N., & Senapati, B.
Affiliations
  • Lowe's (United States) (US)
  • University of Arkansas at Little Rock (US)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2025
Volume
13
Pages
50226-50243
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408564575
Cited by
35
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 15
FWCI
27.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
Keywords
agentic AI, test-driven development, large language models, retail decision-making, system reliability, operational resilience, inventory management, demand forecasting, customer feedback, input filtering, scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review