The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Learning to Abstain: Reliable Medical Image Segmentation With Rejection Option
Open accessAbstract
Uncertainty estimation is an important area of research in the deep learning field by offering numerous potential applications. Selective prediction is one of the possible applications that focuses on rejecting less confident samples to enhance the overall performance and reliability of accepted samples. In the context of segmentation, selective segmentation aims to allow the model to abstain from assigning labels to uncertain pixels. While selective classification has received considerable attention, only a few studies have explored selective segmentation. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach that addresses this gap by incorporating uncertainty learning during model training. Specifically, we propose a new training scheme that encourages the model to identify and alarm uncertain pixels in a real-time manner. Comparative experiments on three public medical segmentation datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Our approach achieves higher Dice scores across multiple coverage levels, surpassing the performance of existing approaches in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Teye, Bayesian uncertainty estimation for batch normalized deep networks, 4907
- 10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196544 · DOI
- Gal, Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning, 1050
- Geifman, SelectiveNet: A deep neural network with an integrated reject option, 2151
- Ziyin, Deep gamblers: Learning to abstain with portfolio theory, 10623
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.042 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-030-72084-1_11 · DOI
- 10.1109/ISBI48211.2021.9433939 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-87234-2_26 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3264582 · DOI
- Ding, Uncertainty-aware training of neural networks for selective medical image segmentation, 156
- 10.1007/s11548-022-02597-0 · DOI
- Neal, 2012, Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks
- Hendrycks, A baseline for detecting misclassified and out-of-distribution examples in neural networks
- Srivastava, 2014, Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1929
- Lakshminarayanan, Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles, 6405
- 10.5555/3295222.3295309 · DOI
- Mandelbaum, 2017, Distance-based confidence score for neural network classifiers, arXiv:1709.09844 · arXiv
- 10.1007/s10462-023-10562-9 · DOI
- Hwang, Confidence-aware learning for deep neural networks, 7034
- Geifman, Bias-reduced uncertainty estimation for deep neural classifiers
- Toneva, An empirical study of example forgetting during deep neural network learning
- Corbière, Addressing failure prediction by learning model confidence, 2902
- 10.1109/3DV.2016.79 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.media.2016.02.006 · DOI
- 10.1002/mp.14676 · DOI
- 10.1109/IPTA50016.2020.9286453 · DOI
- 10.1260/2040-2295.4.3.371 · DOI
- 10.1118/1.4921366 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMI.2010.2047112 · DOI
- 10.59275/j.melba.2020-48g7 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.media.2020.101884 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multi-Resolution UNet: An Improved Medical Image Segmentation Architecture
Zhang, Y., Pan, D., Gong, Y., & Chen, S. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Electromechanical Automation (AIEA) · doi:10.1109/aiea70743.2026.11633055
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanisoglu, M. A., Navab, N., & Kim, S. T.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Kyung Hee University (KR)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2026
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 32655-32665
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7131855312
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by Korean Government (RS-2024-00334321, 2021R1G1A1094990)
- Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by Korean Government (MSIT) (RS-2024-00509257)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- uncertainty estimation, medical image segmentation, training program, coverage level, Dice score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review