Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transaction control expressions for separation of duties

Sandhu, R.·2003·[Proceedings 1988] Fourth Aerospace Computer Security Applications

Abstract

The author describes a model and notation for specifying and enforcing aspects of integrity policies, particularly separation of duties. The key idea is to associate a transaction control expression with each information object. The transaction control expression constrains the pattern in which transactions can be executed on an object. As operations are actually executed the transaction control expressions gets converted to a history. This history serves to enforce separation of duties. Transient objects with a short lifetime are distinguished from persistent objects which are long-lived. Separation of duties is achieved by maintaining a complete history for transient objects but only a partial history for persistent objects. This is possible because of the system-enforced rule that transactions are executed on persistent objects only as a side effect of execution on transient objects.>

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/acsac.1988.113349

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Sandhu, R.
Venue
[Proceedings 1988] Fourth Aerospace Computer Security Applications
Published
2003-01-06
Pages
282-286
OpenAlex
W2143509186
Cited by
165
References
0
FWCI
16.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transaction control expressions for separation of duties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/acsac.1988.113349
The paper
Sandhu, R. (2003). Transaction control expressions for separation of duties. [Proceedings 1988] Fourth Aerospace Computer Security Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/acsac.1988.113349

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.