The Mars Exploration Rover Surface Mobility Flight Software: Driving Ambition
Abstract
NASA's Mars exploration rovers' (MER) onboard mobility flight software was designed to provide robust and flexible operation. The MER vehicles can be commanded directly, or given autonomous control over multiple aspects of mobility: which motions to drive, measurement of actual motion, terrain interpretation, even the selection of targets of interest (although this mode remains largely underused). Vehicle motion can be commanded using multiple layers of control: motor control, direct drive operations (arc, turn in place), and goal-based driving (goto waypoint). Multiple layers of safety checks ensure vehicle performance: command limits (command timeout, time of day limit, software enable, activity constraints), reactive checks (e.g., motor current limit, vehicle tilt limit), and predictive checks (e.g., step, tilt, roughness hazards). From January 2004 through October 2005, Spirit accumulated over 5000 meters and Opportunity 6000 meters of odometry, often covering more than 100 meters in a single day. In this paper we describe the software that has driven these rovers more than a combined 11,000 meters over the Martian surface, including its design and implementation, and summarize current mobility performance results from Mars
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As of Sol 555, Visual Odometry accounted for 792 m of the total 4798 m driven by Spirit.
“As of Sol 555, Visual Odometry accounted for 792 m of the total 4798 m driven by Spirit ( Biesiadecki & Maimone, 2006 ) .”
From Two years of Visual Odometry on the Mars Exploration Rovers (2007) · cites this paper as Biesiadecki & Maimone, 2006
As of Sol 555, Visual Odometry accounted for 682 m of the total 5947 meters driven by Opportunity.
“As of Sol 555, Visual Odometry accounted for 682 m of the total 5947 meters driven by Opportunity ( Biesiadecki & Maimone, 2006 ) .”
From Two years of Visual Odometry on the Mars Exploration Rovers (2007) · cites this paper as Biesiadecki & Maimone, 2006
Cites
Golombek, M., & Rapp, D. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/96je03319 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two years of Visual Odometry on the Mars Exploration Rovers
Maimone, M., Cheng, Y., & Matthies, L. (2007) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20184 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Self-citationTerrain Adaptive Navigation for Planetary Rovers
Helmick, D., Angelova, A., & Matthies, L. (2009) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20292 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
AI4MARS: A Dataset for Terrain-Aware Autonomous Driving on Mars
Swan, R. M., Atha, D., Leopold, H. A., Gildner, M., Oij, S., Chiu, C., & Ono, M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw53098.2021.00226 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Autonomous Navigation Results from the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) Mission
Maimone, M., Johnson, A., Cheng, Y., Willson, R., & Matthies, L. (2006) · Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1007/11552246_1 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationA Comprehensive Review of Path-Planning Algorithms for Planetary Rover Exploration
Miao, Q., & Wei, G. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17111924 · Cited by 13
Enhanced Autonomous Navigation on the Perseverance Mars Rover
Toupet, O., Ono, M., Sesto, T. D., Maimone, M., & McHenry, M. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Field Robotics · doi:10.1109/tfr.2025.3636366 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Biesiadecki, J. J., & Maimone, M. W.
- Affiliations
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-08-02
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 1095-323X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1559777421
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 42.37
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
- Keywords
- Mars Exploration Rover, rover mobility, flight software, autonomous driving, odometry, safety inspection, waypoint navigation, motor control, Spirit rover, Opportunity rover, Mars surface exploration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review