Cited by 117Planetary Science and ExplorationSoil Mechanics and Vehicle DynamicsControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots

The Mars Exploration Rover Surface Mobility Flight Software: Driving Ambition

Biesiadecki, J.J., Maimone, M.W.·2006·2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference

Abstract

NASA's Mars exploration rovers' (MER) onboard mobility flight software was designed to provide robust and flexible operation. The MER vehicles can be commanded directly, or given autonomous control over multiple aspects of mobility: which motions to drive, measurement of actual motion, terrain interpretation, even the selection of targets of interest (although this mode remains largely underused). Vehicle motion can be commanded using multiple layers of control: motor control, direct drive operations (arc, turn in place), and goal-based driving (goto waypoint). Multiple layers of safety checks ensure vehicle performance: command limits (command timeout, time of day limit, software enable, activity constraints), reactive checks (e.g., motor current limit, vehicle tilt limit), and predictive checks (e.g., step, tilt, roughness hazards). From January 2004 through October 2005, Spirit accumulated over 5000 meters and Opportunity 6000 meters of odometry, often covering more than 100 meters in a single day. In this paper we describe the software that has driven these rovers more than a combined 11,000 meters over the Martian surface, including its design and implementation, and summarize current mobility performance results from Mars

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/aero.2006.1655723

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As of Sol 555, Visual Odometry accounted for 792 m of the total 4798 m driven by Spirit.

    “As of Sol 555, Visual Odometry accounted for 792 m of the total 4798 m driven by Spirit ( Biesiadecki & Maimone, 2006 ) .”

    From Two years of Visual Odometry on the Mars Exploration Rovers (2007) · cites this paper as Biesiadecki & Maimone, 2006

  • As of Sol 555, Visual Odometry accounted for 682 m of the total 5947 meters driven by Opportunity.

    “As of Sol 555, Visual Odometry accounted for 682 m of the total 5947 meters driven by Opportunity ( Biesiadecki & Maimone, 2006 ) .”

    From Two years of Visual Odometry on the Mars Exploration Rovers (2007) · cites this paper as Biesiadecki & Maimone, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biesiadecki, J. J., & Maimone, M. W.
Affiliations
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
Venue
2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2006-08-02
Pages
1-15
ISSN
1095-323X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1559777421
Cited by
117
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
42.37
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Keywords
Mars Exploration Rover, rover mobility, flight software, autonomous driving, odometry, safety inspection, waypoint navigation, motor control, Spirit rover, Opportunity rover, Mars surface exploration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review