Cited by 17Robotic Path Planning AlgorithmsReinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization

A Comprehensive Review of Path-Planning Algorithms for Planetary Rover Exploration

Open access
Miao, Qingliang, Wei, Guangfei·2025·Remote Sensing

Abstract

Path-planning algorithms for planetary rovers are critical for autonomous robotic exploration, enabling the efficient and safe traversal of complex and dynamic extraterrestrial terrains. Unlike terrestrial mobile robots, planetary rovers must navigate highly unpredictable environments influenced by diverse factors such as terrain variability, obstacles, illumination conditions, and temperature fluctuations, necessitating advanced path-planning strategies to ensure mission success. This review comprehensively synthesizes recent advancements in planetary rover path-planning algorithms. First, we categorize these algorithms from a constraint-oriented perspective, distinguishing between internal rover state constraints and external environmental constraints. Next, we examine rule-based path-planning approaches, including graph search-based methods, potential field methods, sampling-based techniques, and dynamic window approaches, analyzing representative algorithms in each category. Subsequently, we explore bio-inspired path-planning methods, such as evolutionary algorithms, fuzzy computing, and machine learning-based approaches, with a particular emphasis on the latest developments and prospects of machine learning techniques in planetary rover navigation. Finally, we synthesize key insights from existing algorithms and discuss future research directions, highlighting their potential applications in planetary exploration missions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rs17111924

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most works are limited to single or few regions of interest, visual semantic or grasping tasks, or other robotic platforms, but not specifically for benchmarking rover global path planning.

    “most works are limited to single or few regions of interest (Tamar et al., 2016; Miao and Wei, 2025), visual semantic or grasping tasks (Shuaifeng et al., 2025; Orsula et al., 2022), or other robotic platforms (Richter et al., 2024), but not specifically for benchmarking rover global path planning.”

    From Planetary Terrain Datasets and Benchmarks for Rover Path Planning (2025) · cites this paper as Miao and Wei, 2025

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Harvey, B. Soviet and Russian Lunar Exploration; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007.
  2. Dengyun, Y.; Xueying, W.; Weiren, W. Review of technology development for Chinese lunar exploration program. J. Deep Space Explor. 2016, 3, 307-314.
  3. Johnston, R.S.; Hull, W.E.; Dietlein, L.; Berry, C. Apollo missions. In Biomedical Results of Apollo; NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 1975; pp. 9-40.
  4. Bassil, Y. Neural network model for path-planning of robotic rover systems. arXiv 2012, arXiv:1204.0183. · arXiv
  5. Jianxin, C.; Yan, X.; Baoyi, T.; Xiaoyan, M.; Xiang, L.; Yong, J.; Jin, Z.; Lei, W. Guidance, navigation and control technologies of Chang'E-3 lunar rover. Sci. Sin. 2014, 44, 461.
  6. Huiting, W.; Meng, Y.; Yuye, L.; Tao, H.; Bo, Z. Autonomous Navigation Path Planning Algorithm for Rovers in Lunar South Pole Surface. J. Deep Space Explor. 2023, 10, 598-607.
  7. Peijian, Y.; Linzhi, M.; Jinan, M.; Qiang, W.; Ying, L.; Yu, D.; Shuo, W. Suggestions on artificial intelligence technology application and development in deep space exploration. J. Deep Space Explor. 2019, 6, 303-316, 383. 107.
  8. Doma, P.; Arab, A.; Xiao, X. LLM-Enhanced Path Planning: Safe and Efficient Autonomous Navigation with Instructional Inputs. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2412.02655. 116. Zhao, Y.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Tai, Y.-W.; Tang, C.-K. Dynamic Path Navigation for Motion Agents with LLM Reasoning. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.07323. 117. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miao, Q., & Wei, G.
Affiliations
Deep Space Exploration Laboratory (CN)
Corresponding author
Wei, Guangfei
Venue
Remote Sensing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-05-31
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
1924
ISSN
2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410966838
Cited by
13
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Anhui Natural Science Foundation (2408085Y021, 42473053)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (2408085Y021, 42473053)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Keywords
planetary rovers, path planning, autonomous navigation, potential field method, sampling-based path planning, dynamic window approach, graph search, bio-inspired algorithms, evolutionary algorithms, fuzzy computing, environmental constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review