Cited by 251Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAerospace Engineering and Control SystemsInertial Sensor and Navigation

A UAV system for inspection of industrial facilities

Open access
Nikolic, J., Burri, M., Rehder, J., Leutenegger, S., Huerzeler, C., Siegwart, R.·2013·2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference

Abstract

This work presents a small-scale Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) capable of performing inspection tasks in enclosed industrial environments. Vehicles with such capabilities have the potential to reduce human involvement in hazardous tasks and can minimize facility outage periods. The results presented generalize to UAS exploration tasks in almost any GPS-denied indoor environment. The contribution of this work is twofold. First, results from autonomous flights inside an industrial boiler of a power plant are presented. A lightweight, vision-aided inertial navigation system provides reliable state estimates under difficult environmental conditions typical for such sites. It relies solely on measurements from an on-board MEMS inertial measurement unit and a pair of cameras arranged in a classical stereo configuration. A model-predictive controller allows for efficient trajectory following and enables flight in close proximity to the boiler surface. As a second contribution, we highlight ongoing developments by displaying state estimation and structure recovery results acquired with an integrated visual/inertial sensor that will be employed on future aerial service robotic platforms. A tight integration in hardware facilitates spatial and temporal calibration of the different sensors and thus enables more accurate and robust ego-motion estimates. Comparison with ground truth obtained from a laser tracker shows that such a sensor can provide motion estimates with drift rates of only few centimeters over the period of a typical flight.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/aero.2013.6496959

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nikolic, J., Burri, M., Rehder, J., Leutenegger, S., Huerzeler, C., & Siegwart, R.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-03
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1095-323X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006433700
Cited by
251
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5
FWCI
22.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Keywords
unmanned aerial systems, indoor exploration, GPS-denied environments, vision-aided inertial navigation, stereo vision, MEMS inertial measurement unit, model predictive control, trajectory tracking, power plant boilers, sensor calibration, state estimation, structure recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review