Cited by 15Advanced DC-DC ConvertersWireless Power Transfer SystemsMultilevel Inverters and Converters

Integrated Grid Inductor-Transformer Structure with Reduced Core Loss and Volume for E-Capless Single-Stage EV Charger

Muhammad, Ramadhan, Kieu, Huu-Phuc, Park, Junyeong, Tat-Thang, LE, Choi, Sewan, Jung, Hoyoung, Yoon, Bo-Kyung·2022·2022 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)

Abstract

This paper presents the design and optimization of an integrated magnetic structure that combines the grid inductors and transformer in the single-stage EV -charger. The proposed integration technique reduces the number of magnetic bodies, hence reducing the cost and total magnetic core loss while increasing the power density. By utilizing the fixed 50% duty cycle operation of the converter, a further reduction in core loss can be achieved resulting in improved light-load efficiency. This paper also presents an analysis of the optimal PCB winding arrangements for the proposed structure to achieve low winding AC loss and stray capacitance. To validate the proposed integrated magnetic structure, a 3.7 kW single-stage AC-DC converter prototype with four different cases of magnetic structures is built. Experimental comparison of these four cases shows that the proposed integrated magnetic structure has higher efficiency and power density compared to the non-integrated ones. U sing the proposed integrated magnetic structure, the core loss that dominates at light-load is improved resulting in an increase of efficiency by 0.9%. At the same time, the proposed integration technique reduces the number of magnetic cores as well as total core volume, reducing the cost and improving the converter power density by up to 11.1 %.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/apec43599.2022.9773511

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seoul Tech in [117] present a single-stage OBC converter which is extremely compact and uses an interleaved dual active bridge (DAB) type of configuration, with a power density of 7.3 kW/L and an efficiency of 97.1%.

    “Seoul Tech in [117] present a single-stage OBC converter which is extremely compact and uses an interleaved dual active bridge (DAB) type of configuration.The presented topology has a power density of 7.3 kW/L and a reduced efficiency value of 97.1%.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muhammad, R., Kieu, H.-P., Park, J., Tat-Thang, L., Choi, S., Jung, H., & Yoon, B.-K.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University of Science and Technology Seoul,Korea
  • Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Hyundai Motors (South Korea) (KR)
Venue
2022 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-03-20
Pages
873-878
ISSN
1048-2334 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280533257
Cited by
15
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.85
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
Keywords
transformer models, core loss reduction, power density, light load efficiency, parasitic capacitance, AC-DC converter, electric vehicle charging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review