Cited by 96Machine Learning and AlgorithmsAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Semi-Supervised Classification of Network Data Using Very Few Labels

Lin, Frank, Cohen, William W.·2010·2010 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining

Abstract

The goal of semi-supervised learning (SSL) methods is to reduce the amount of labeled training data required by learning from both labeled and unlabeled instances. Macskassy and Provost (2007) proposed the weighted-vote relational neighbor classifier (wvRN) as a simple yet effective baseline for semi-supervised learning on network data. It is similar to many recent graph-based SSL methods and is shown to be essentially the same as the Gaussian-field harmonic functions classifier proposed by Zhu et al. (2003) and proves to be very effective on some benchmark network datasets. We describe another simple and intuitive semi-supervised learning method based on random graph walk that outperforms wvRN by a large margin on several benchmark datasets when very few labels are available. Additionally, we show that using authoritative instances as training seeds --- instances that arguably cost much less to label --- dramatically reduces the amount of labeled data required to achieve the same classification accuracy. For some existing state-of-the-art semi-supervised learning methods the labeled data needed is reduced by a factor of 50.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/asonam.2010.19

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, F., & Cohen, W. W.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
2010 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-08
Pages
192-199
OpenAlex
W2148534792
Cited by
96
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
semi-supervised classification, network data, graph learning, random walks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review