Cited by 12Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Categorization of patients' health status in COPD disease using a wearable platform and random forests methodology

Bellos, C., Papadopoulos, A., Rosso, R., Fotiadis, D. I.·2012·Proceedings of 2012 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Chronic diseases are diseases of long duration and generally slow progression. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) as one of these requires frequent examinations and hospital visits for its long-term management. CHRONIOUS, an integrated platform for chronic disease patients, provides functional information about their health status continuously, from the patients' environment. The main component of the system is the intelligent core of the wearable device that aims at the real-time characterization of the patients' health level based on the fusion of multiple data that acquired by wearable sensors, through patients smart device interface or retrieved from the specific system's database. The Decision Support System (DSS) is activated whenever new data are entered, and is functioning using by two classification methodologies composed by highly effective algorithms. These parallel classification techniques are: a rule-based expert system and a supervised Radom Forest classifier. The classification conclusion after the above analysis is twofold. The supervised technique provides with high accuracy the severity of patients' health level and the rule-based part, extracts the critical parameters or their combination which had been triggered leading in the improvement or the worsening of the patient's condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bhi.2012.6211600

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent works in diagnosis/decision making involve estimating severity of health episodes of patients with chronic disease, sleep issues such as polysomnography and apnea, estimation and classification of health conditions, and emotion recognition.

    “Some examples of recent works in this area involve estimating the severity of health episodes of patients suffering chronic disease [44–46], sleep issues such as polysomnography and apnea [47,48], estimation and classification of health conditions [49,50], and emotion recognition [51].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bellos, C., Papadopoulos, A., Rosso, R., & Fotiadis, D. I.
Affiliations
Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
Venue
Proceedings of 2012 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-01
Pages
404-407
ISSN
2641-3590 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972860702
Cited by
12
References
8
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI ...) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, wearable sensors, COPD severity assessment, decision support system, rule-based expert systems, random forest, sensor fusion, chronic disease management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review