Cited by 21Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringWireless Sensor Networks for Data AnalysisContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Extraction and Analysis of features acquired by wearable sensors network

Bellos, Christos C., Papadopoulos, Athanasios, Rosso, Roberto, Fotiadis, Dimitrios I.·2010·Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine

Abstract

The developed system aims to collect and analyze information valuable for estimating the severity of a health episode regarding patients suffering from chronic diseases. The system addresses a wearable platform, based on multi-parametric sensor data, a device which collects the data and a Smart Assistant Device, responsible for analyzing the collected multi-parametric data and facilitating the monitor of people suffering from chronic diseases in long-stay setting. The wearable platform integrates several sensors collecting information regarding motion, ECG, respiration, oxygen saturation (SpO2), temperature and various other parameters. The Smart Assistant Device, after applying pre-processing and feature extraction techniques, fuses all sensor acquired data with information inserted by the patient. An Intelligent System is developed to analyze sensors' acquired and patient inputted data, facilitating data mining techniques, and decides upon the severity of a pathological episode that was appeared to the patient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/itab.2010.5687761

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feature extraction provides a meaningful representation of wearable sensor data that can formulate the relation of raw data with expected knowledge for decision making.

    “Especially in wearable sensor data, according to the magnitude and complexity of the raw data, feature extraction provides a meaningful representation of the sensor data which can formulate the relation of raw data with the expected knowledge for decision making [64].”
  • For ECG signals, although Bsoul et al. proposed dozens of features, the main focus of research is to consider R points and their properties such as R-R intervals and pick counts.

    “As an example, for the works studying ECG signals, although Bsoul et al. [65] have proposed dozens of features, the main focus of research is to consider R points (the pick point of each beat), and its properties in ECG pulses such as R-R intervals, pick counts, etc. [39,64].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bellos, C. C., Papadopoulos, A., Rosso, R., & Fotiadis, D. I.
Affiliations
Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
Venue
Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-11
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W2548553586
Cited by
21
References
11
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
wearable sensors, chronic disease monitoring, feature extraction, long-stay care, ECG, respiratory monitoring, oxygen saturation, body temperature, intelligent health systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review