Cited by 17Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionGait Recognition and AnalysisArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Artificial Neural Networks Classification of Patients with Parkinsonism based on Gait

Open access
Fernandes, Carlos, Fonseca, Luis, Ferreira, Flora, Gago, Miguel, Costa, Lus, Sousa, Nuno, Ferreira, Carlos, Gama, Joao +2 more·2018·2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)

Abstract

Differential diagnosis between Idiopathic Parkin-son's disease (IPD) and Vascular Parkinsonism (VaP) is a difficult task, especially early in the disease. There is growing evidence to support the use of gait assessment in diagnosis and management of movement disorder diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of some machine learning strategies in distinguishing IPD and VaP gait. Wearable sensors positioned on both feet were used to acquire the gait data from 15 IPD, 15 VaP, and 15 healthy subjects. A comparative classification analysis was performed by applying two supervised machine learning algorithms: Multiple Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) and Deep Belief Networks (DBNs). The decisional space was composed of the gait variables, with or without neuropsychological evaluation (Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) score), top-ranked in an error incremental analysis. In the classification task of characterizing parkinsonian gait by distinguishing between patients (IPD+VaP) and healthy control, from the all strides classification of the gait performed by the person, high accuracy (93% with or without MoCA) was obtained for both algorithms. In the classification task of the two groups of patients (VaP vs. IPD), DBN classifier achieved higher performance (73% with MoCA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on gait classification that includes a VaP group. DBN classifiers are not frequently applied in literature to similar studies, but the result…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bibm.2018.8621466

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fernandes et al. employed DBNs to support gait assessment in diagnosis of Parkinson's and movement disorder diseases, confirming that DBN-based approaches are suitable for the task.

    “Regarding gait recognition, Fernandes et al. [21] employed DBNs to support gait assessment in the diagnosis of Parkinson's and movement disorder diseases. The authors employed wearable sensors to extract features from the subjects and performed a comparative classification analysis of parkinsonian gait, confirming that DBN-based approaches are suitable for the task.”

    From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernandes, C., Fonseca, L., Ferreira, F., Gago, M., Costa, L., Sousa, N., Ferreira, C., Gama, J., Erlhagen, W., & Bicho, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Minho (PT)
  • INESC TEC (PT)
  • Centro ALGORITMI (PT)
Venue
2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-12
Pages
2024-2030
OpenAlex
W2912379919
Cited by
17
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
13.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
parkinsonism, idiopathic Parkinson's disease, vascular parkinsonism, gait analysis, wearable sensors, deep belief network, multilayer perceptron, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, differential diagnosis, movement disorders, gait classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review