Cited by 35EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEpilepsy research and treatmentECG Monitoring and Analysis

Towards Long-term Non-invasive Monitoring for Epilepsy via Wearable EEG Devices

Open access
Ingolfsson, Thorir Mar, Cossettini, Andrea, Wang, Xiaying, Tabanelli, Enrico, Tagliavini, Giuseppe, Ryvlin, Philippe, Benini, Luca, Benatti, Simone·2021·2021 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS)

Abstract

We present the implementation of seizure detection algorithms based on a minimal number of EEG channels on a parallel ultra-low-power embedded platform. The analyses are based on the CHB-MIT dataset, and include explorations of different classification approaches (Support Vector Machines, Random Forest, Extra Trees, AdaBoost) and different pre/post-processing techniques to maximize sensitivity while guaranteeing no false alarms. We analyze global and subject-specific approaches, considering all 23-electrodes or only 4 temporal channels. For 8 s window size and subject-specific approach, we report zero false positives and 100% sensitivity. These algorithms are parallelized and optimized for a parallel ultra-low power (PULP) platform, enabling 300h of continuous monitoring on a 300 mAh battery, in a wearable form factor and power budget. These results pave the way for the implementation of affordable, wearable, long-term epilepsy monitoring solutions with low false-positive rates and high sensitivity, meeting both patient and caregiver requirements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/biocas49922.2021.9644949

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The setup in [103] accomplished up to 40.87 hours of monitoring using a single battery charge, approximately a whole day of work.

    “The entire setup accomplish up o 40.87 hours of monitoring using a single battery charge (approximately a whole day of work); in”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [103]

    The Results & Discussion section estimates roughly 300 hours of monitoring on a 300 mAh battery for the paper's approach, not 40.87 hours. It reports a 7.34-fold battery-life improvement over a different implementation; 40.87 hours is approximately 300 divided by 7.34, suggesting the claim confuses that comparator with the cited setup. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Authors in [103] deployed an ultra low powered wearable device for treatment of epilepsy through detection of epileptic seizure.

    “The authors in [103] deploy an ultra low powered wearable device in treatment of this neurological deficiency through the detection of epileptic seizure.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [103]

    The Abstract and ‘D. Embedded platform’ describe seizure-detection algorithms implemented on an ultra-low-power wearable device. The Introduction says monitoring can help clinicians refine therapies, but the paper does not report deploying the device as an epilepsy treatment; its analyses use an existing EEG dataset. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. N. Pham et al., "WAKE: a behind-the-ear wearable system for mi- crosleep detection," in Proc. Int. MobiSys, 2020, pp. 404-418.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ingolfsson, T. M., Cossettini, A., Wang, X., Tabanelli, E., Tagliavini, G., Ryvlin, P., Benini, L., & Benatti, S.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Venue
2021 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10-07
Pages
01-04
OpenAlex
W3171973026
Cited by
35
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7
FWCI
10.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation (Project PEDESITE) (agreement)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
epilepsy, seizure detection, wearable EEG, long-term monitoring, CHB-MIT dataset, false alarm reduction, parallel machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review