Cited by 45EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEpilepsy research and treatmentECG Monitoring and Analysis

Robust Epileptic Seizure Detection on Wearable Systems with Reduced False-Alarm Rate

Open access
Zanetti, Renato, Aminifar, Amir, Atienza, David·2020·2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)

Abstract

Epilepsy affects more than 50 million people and ranks among the most common neurological diseases worldwide. Despite advances in treatment, one-third of patients still suffer from refractory epilepsy. Wearable devices for real-time patient monitoring can potentially improve the quality of life for such patients and reduce the mortality rate due to seizure-related accidents and sudden death in epilepsy. However, the majority of employed seizure detection techniques and devices suffer from unacceptable false-alarm rate. In this paper, we propose a robust seizure detection methodology for a wearable platform and validate it on the Physionet.org CHB-MIT Scalp EEG database. It reaches sensitivity of 0.966 and specificity of 0.925, and reducing the false-alarm rate by 34.7%. We also evaluate the battery lifetime of the wearable system including our proposed methodology and demonstrate the feasibility of using it in real time for up to 40.87 hours on a single battery charge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/embc44109.2020.9175339

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A ML model deployed on ATMega2560 microcontroller achieved high accuracy of 93.58% for detection and recovery from FoG in Parkinson's patients, balancing power consumption and processing speed [101].

    “Such contributions can be recognized in the detection and recovery from FoGnin Parkinson's patients, achieving high accuracy of 93.58% by a ML model deployed on ATMega2560 microcontroller that is able to balance between power consumption and processing speed [101].”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [101]

  • In [101], the accuracy drop is estimated to be 1.3%.

    “In [101], the accuracy drop is estimated to be 1.3%.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [101]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zanetti, R., Aminifar, A., & Atienza, D.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Venue
2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-07
Volume
2020
Pages
4248-4251
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037110129
Cited by
45
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7
FWCI
7.16
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
seizure detection, wearable devices, false alarm reduction, scalp EEG, CHB-MIT Scalp EEG Database, drug-resistant epilepsy, real-time patient monitoring, battery life
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, Quality of Life, Seizures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review