Cited by 20Teleoperation and Haptic SystemsMotor Control and AdaptationProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Synthesis and control of an assistive robotic tennis trainer

Marchal-Crespo, Laura, Rauter, Georg, Wyss, Dario, von Zitzewitz, Joachim, Riener, Robert·2012·2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob)

Abstract

While robotic guidance can improve ongoing performance of a motor task, several studies have found that it ultimately impairs motor learning. However, some recent studies found that the haptic demonstration of optimal timing, rather than movement magnitude, apparently transfers to participants trained with robotic guidance. Here, we describe the synthesis, design and control of a novel tendon-based haptic device able to apply different forms of physical guidance to train a task for which timing is the critical performance determinant: a forearm tennis stroke. We designed three guidance control strategies: a position controller to apply a fixed haptic guidance, a path controller with zero-force controller inside a safety tunnel around the desired trajectory to apply no guidance, and a guidance-as-needed controller to adapt the amount of support as training progresses. The controllers were experimentally tested and evaluation results are presented. The position controller was able to track the desired trajectory, with minimum errors. The path controller avoided leaving the tunnel, but the zero-force controller inside the tunnel allowed subjects to intend the task by themselves. Finally, the guidance-as-needed controller was able to modulate the guidance, allowing more autonomy to initiate the movements as training progressed, while limiting tracking and velocity errors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/biorob.2012.6290262

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the tennis-type task, three control concepts (position control, path control, guidance-as-needed) were implemented to investigate influence on task timing, but learning was not assessed.

    “In the tennis-type task, three different control concepts were implemented-position control, path control, and guidance-as-needed controller-in order to investigate the influence of different haptic guidance concepts on task timing, whereby learning was not assessed (Marchal-Crespo et al., 2012).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Marchal-Crespo et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marchal-Crespo, L., Rauter, G., Wyss, D., von Zitzewitz, J., & Riener, R.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-06
Pages
355-360
ISSN
2155-1774 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079836588
Cited by
20
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
assistive robotics, haptic guidance, motor learning, trajectory tracking, adaptive guidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review