Cited by 394Motor Control and AdaptationTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Haptic guidance: experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill

Feygin, D., Keehner, M., Tendick, R.·2003·Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002

Abstract

In this paper we investigate a use of haptics for skills training which we call haptic guidance. In the haptic guidance paradigm, the subject is physically guided through the ideal motion by the haptic interface, thus giving the subject a kinesthetic understanding of what is required. Subjects learned a complex 3D motion under three training conditions (haptic, visual, haptic and visual) and were required to manually reproduce the movement under two recall conditions (with vision, without vision). Performance was measured in terms of position, shape, timing, and drift. Findings from this study indicate that haptic guidance is effective in training. While visual training was better for teaching the trajectory shape, temporal aspects of the task were more effectively learned from haptic guidance. This supports a possible role for haptics in the training of perceptual motor skills in virtual environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/haptic.2002.998939

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feygin, D., Keehner, M., & Tendick, R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002
Published
2003-06-25
Pages
40-47
OpenAlex
W2152870685
Cited by
394
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 19
FWCI
44.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
haptic guidance, haptic interface, perceptual-motor skills, motor skill training, kinesthetic learning, trajectory shape, movement timing, visual training, virtual worlds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review