Cited by 53Face recognition and analysisFace and Expression RecognitionBiometric Identification and Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MDLFace: Memorability augmented deep learning for video face recognition

Goswami, Gaurav, Bhardwaj, Romil, Singh, Richa, Vatsa, Mayank·2014·IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics

Abstract

Videos have ample amount of information in the form of frames that can be utilized for feature extraction and matching. However, face images in not all of the frames are “memorable” and useful. Therefore, utilizing all the frames available in a video for recognition does not necessarily improve the performance but significantly increases the computation time. In this research, we present a memorability based frame selection algorithm that enables automatic selection of memorable frames for facial feature extraction and matching. A deep learning algorithm is then proposed that utilizes a stack of denoising autoencoders and deep Boltzmann machines to perform face recognition using the most memorable frames. The proposed algorithm, termed as MDLFace, is evaluated on two publicly available video face databases, Youtube Faces and Point and Shoot Challenge. The results show that the proposed algorithm achieves state-of-the-art performance at low false accept rates.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/btas.2014.6996299

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995566 · DOI
  2. 10.3758/BF03199666 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.cviu.2005.02.002 · DOI
  4. taigman, 2014, Deepface: Closing the gap to human-level performance in face verification, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  5. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.242 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/cercor/bhl138 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1142/S0218001412660024 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/TIFS.2014.2318433 · DOI
  9. 10.3758/BF03210319 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.1127647 · DOI · Paper page
  11. hinton, 2012, A better way to pretrain deep boltzmann machines, Advances in neural information processing systems, 25, 2447
  12. isola, 2011, Understanding the intrinsic memorability of images, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2429
  13. 10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2344667 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995721 · DOI
  15. vincent, 2010, Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 3371
  16. collobert, 2011, Natural language processing (almost) from scratch, The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2493
  17. goh, 2005, The cmu face in action (fia) database, Analysis and Modelling of Faces and Gestures 3723 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 255
  18. gross, 2001, The cmu motion of body (mobo) database, Technical Report CMU-RI-TR 01-18
  19. salakhutdinov, 2009, Deep boltzmann machines, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 448
  20. rifai, 2011, The manifold tangent classifier, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2294
  21. 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383378 · DOI
  22. jain, 2005, Handbook of Face Recognition
  23. seide, 2011, Conversational speech transcription using context-dependent deep neural networks, InterSpeech, 437, 10.21437/Interspeech.2011-169 · DOI
  24. ross, 2006, Handbook of Multibiometrics (International Series on Biometrics)
  25. liu, 2003, Video-based face recognition using adaptive hidden markov models, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 340
  26. 10.1109/WMVC.2007.29 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/TIFS.2012.2223684 · DOI
  28. bengio, 2007, Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks, Advances in neural information processing systems, 19, 153
  29. 10.1109/BTAS.2013.6712704 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50 · DOI · Paper page
  31. rrnyi, 1961, On measures of entropy and information, Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 547
  32. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099212 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/CVPRW.2013.33 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goswami, G., Bhardwaj, R., Singh, R., & Vatsa, M.
Affiliations
Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IN)
Venue
IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-09
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W2083708558
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Electronics and Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
video-based face recognition, frame selection, denoising autoencoder, deep Boltzmann machine, facial feature extraction, facial feature matching, computational efficiency, false acceptance rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review