Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces

Vokey, John R., Read, J. Don·1992·Memory & Cognition

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03199666

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Old/new memory tasks that investigate face identification elicit a dissociation similar to that found in face matching tasks.

    “Second, it has long been observed that oldnew memory tasks that investigate face identification elicit a dissociation similar to that which is found in face matching tasks (e.g., Hancock et al., 1996aHancock et al., , 1996b;;Megreya & Burton, 2007;Vokey & Read, 1992).”

    From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Vokey & Read, 1992

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Bartlett, J. C., Hurry, S., & Thorley, W., (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces.Memory A Cognition.12, 219–228. · DOI
  2. Bartlett, J. C., & Leslie, J-E. (1986). Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces.Memory A Cognition,14, 371–381. · DOI
  3. Brown, J., Lewis, V. J., & Monk, A. F. (1977). Memorability, word frequency and negative recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 461–473. · DOI
  4. Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: Visual and non-visual processes in face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,73, 105–116. · DOI
  5. Cohen, M. E., & Carr, W. J. (1975). Facial recognition and the von Restorff effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,6, 383–384. · DOI
  6. Courtois, M. R., & Mueller, J. H. (1981). Target and distractor typicality in facial recognition.Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 639–645. · DOI
  7. Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces.Perception A Psychophysics,10, 393–396. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., Gibung, F., & Shepherd, J. (1988). Stimulus factors in face learning. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory; Current research and issues: Vol. 1. Memory in everyday life (pp. 136–143). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
  9. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory A Cognition,13, 8–20. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, A Cognition,16, 5–16. · DOI
  11. Going, M., & Read, J. D. (1974). The effect of uniqueness, sex of subject and sex of photograph on facial recognition.Perceptual & Motor Skills,39, 109–110. · DOI
  12. Hay, D. C., & Young, A. W. (1982). The human face. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 173–202). London: Academic Press.
  13. Krouse, F. L. (1981). Effects of pose, pose change, and delay on face recognition performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 651–654. · DOI
  14. Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average.Psychological Science,1, 115–121. · DOI
  15. Light, L. L., Hollander, S., & Kayra-Stuart, F. (1981). Why attractive people are harder to remember.Personality A Social Psychology Bulletin,7, 269–276. · DOI
  16. Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., & Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 212–228. · DOI
  17. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271. · DOI
  18. McKelvie, S. J. (1981). Sex differences in memory for faces.Journal of Psychology,107, 109–125. · DOI
  19. Mueller, J. H., Heesacker, M., & Ross, M. J. (1984). Likability of targets and distractors in facial recognition.American Journal of Psychology,97, 235–247. · DOI
  20. Patterson, K. E. (1978). Person recognition: More than a pretty face. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (pp. 228–235). New York: Academic Press.
  21. Patterson, K. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1977). When face recognition fails.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 406–417. · DOI
  22. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982).Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  23. Read, J. D., Vokey, J. R., & Hammersley, R. (1990). Changing photos of faces: Effects of exposure duration and photo similarity on recognition and the accuracy-confidence relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 870–882. · DOI
  24. Seamon, J. G. (1982). Dynamic facial recognition: Examination of a natural phenomenon.American Journal of Psychology,95, 363–381. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies.Psychological Bulletin,100, 139–156. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Shepherd, J. W. (1981). Social factors in face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.),Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 57–79). London; Academic Press.
  27. Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1973). The effect of attractiveness on recognition memory for faces.American Journal of Psychology,86, 627–633. · DOI
  28. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50. · DOI
  29. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986a). The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces.Perception,15, 525–535. · DOI
  30. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986b). Recognizing familiar faces; The role of distinctiveness and familiarity.Canadian Journal of Psychology,40, 300–305. · DOI
  31. Vokey, J. R., & Read, J. D. (1988). Typicality, familiarity and the recognition of male and female faces.Canadian Journal of Psychology,42, 489–495. · DOI
  32. Winograd, E. (1981). Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Learning & Memory,7, 181–190. · DOI
  33. Woodhead, M. M., Baddeley, A. D., & Simmonds, D. C. (1979). On training people to recognize faces.Ergonomics,22, 333–343. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vokey, J. R., & Read, J. D.
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Published
1992-05
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
291-302
ISSN
  • 0090-502X
  • 1532-5946
Cited by
174
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review