Cited by 3Software Engineering ResearchSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing Multi-Agent LLM Applications Through Continuous Human-LLM Co-Programming

Song, Hui, Goknil, Arda, Jiang, Xiaojun, Melum, Espen, Joe, Hyunwhan, Gazzotti, Caterina, Frascolla, Valerio, Videsjorden, Adela Nedisan, Nguyen, Phu·2025·2025 IEEE/ACM 4th International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN)

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new possibilities for intelligent multi-agent systems capable of autonomously performing complex tasks. To build such systems, LLMs can be leveraged for task-solving, tool interaction, and code generation but at the same time their costs and unpredictability have to be properly managed. To do so this paper introduces COPMA, a model-based approach to enabling continuous human-LLM co-programming of multi-agent LLM applications. COPMA uses feature-block models to track application features and their implementations as agents and code blocks. Supported by co-programming patterns, de-velopers are guided in constructing, refining, and refactoring feature implementations via trial-and-errors with LLM agents, leveraging their feedback, suggestions, and code examples. The patterns guide the shift of feature implementations between agents and code to balance flexibility, predictability, and cost. Our experience in developing LLM agents for collecting and reviewing medical research papers demonstrates that human-LLM co-programming can reduce development effort to enable rapid prototyping of multi-agent LLM applications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cain66642.2025.00013

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Liu, 2024, Reason for future, act for now: A principled architecture for autonomous lIm agents, ICML’24
  2. Talebirad, 2023, Multi-agent collaboration: Harnessing the power of intelligent lIm agents, arXiv preprint
  3. Liu, 2023, Agentbench: Evaluating IIms as agents, arXiv preprint
  4. 10.24963/ijcai.2024/890 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Wu, 2023, Autogen: Enabling next-gen lIm applications via multi-agent conversation framework, arXiv preprint
  6. Xie, 2023, Openagents: An open platform for language agents in the wild, arXiv preprint
  7. 2024, Agentgpt: a tool to configure and deploy autonomous ai agents
  8. Dibia, 2024, Multi-agent lIm applications - a review of current research, tools, and challenges, designingwithml.com
  9. 10.1145/3695988 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Achiam, 2023, Gpt-4 technical report, arXiv preprint
  11. 10.1109/MS.2020.2993662 · DOI
  12. 10.1145/3638247 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/3487043 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s10515-024-00426-z · DOI
  15. 10.1109/ICSE-FoSE59343.2023.00008 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1007/b96018 · DOI
  17. 10.1017/S0269888913000088 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/11787044_22 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/978-3-540-75524-1_12 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/978-3-540-74949-3_2 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.cl.2017.06.001 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.simpat.2017.11.006 · DOI
  23. Kardas, 2006, Metamodeling of semantic web enabled multi agent systems, Multiagent Systems and Software Architecture, 2006, 79
  24. 10.1142/S0218843009002014 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.07.022 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/d41586-024-03676-9 · DOI
  27. Canese, 2013, Pubmed: the bibliographic database, The NCBI handbook, 2
  28. 10.1162/qss_a_00022 · DOI
  29. 2024, Neo4j: Graph database and analytics
  30. 10.1016/j.is.2010.01.001 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/MS.2002.1020288 · DOI
  32. 2024, Cyper query language
  33. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abb3107 · DOI
  34. 10.55662/JST.2023.4605 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Song, H., Goknil, A., Jiang, X., Melum, E., Joe, H., Gazzotti, C., Frascolla, V., Videsjorden, A. N., & Nguyen, P.
Affiliations
  • SINTEF Digital (NO)
  • SINTEF Digital,Oslo,Norway
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • Intel (Germany) (DE)
Venue
2025 IEEE/ACM 4th International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2025-04-27
Pages
42-47
OpenAlex
W4411337603
Cited by
3
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/ACM International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) (publishedVersion)
Funders
International Research Development Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2023–00268071)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
large language models, rapid prototyping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review