Large Language Model Based Multi-agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across a wide array of tasks. Due to their notable capabilities in planning and reasoning, LLMs have been utilized as autonomous agents for the automatic execution of various tasks. Recently, LLM-based agent systems have rapidly evolved from single-agent planning or decision-making to operating as multi-agent systems, enhancing their ability in complex problem-solving and world simulation. To offer an overview of this dynamic field, we present this survey to offer an in-depth discussion on the essential aspects and challenges of LLM-based multi-agent (LLM-MA) systems. Our objective is to provide readers with an in-depth understanding of these key points: the domains and settings where LLM-MA systems operate or simulate; the profiling and communication methods of these agents; and the means by which these agents develop their skills. For those interested in delving into this field, we also summarize the commonly used datasets or benchmarks. To keep researchers updated on the latest studies, we maintain an open-source GitHub repository (github.com/taichengguo/LLM_MultiAgents_Survey_Papers), dedicated to outlining the research of LLM-MA research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Machine psychology can reveal patterns of social behavior and interaction among LLMs, individually and collectively, for problem solving or world simulation.
“In sum, machine psychology can reveal patterns of social behavior and interaction among LLMs, individually and collectively, be it for problem solving or world simulation (Guo et al., 2024).”
From Machine Psychology (2023) · cites this paper as Guo et al., 2024
The Psychology passage (Sandbox section; page unavailable) describes using psychological theories and experiments to analyze individual agents’ behavior and emergent collective patterns in simulations. Section 4.1 describes agents interacting to solve problems, but does not say that psychological analysis reveals their social behavior in that setting. The claim extends the psychology point from world simulation to problem solving. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- Agashe et al., 2023] Saaket Agashe, Yue Fan, and Xin Eric Wang. Evaluating multi-agent coordination abilities in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03903, 2023. · arXiv
- Gati V Aher, Rosa I Arriaga, and Adam Tauman Kalai. Using large language models to simulate multiple humans and replicate human subject studies. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 337-371. PMLR, 2023.
- Elif Akata, Lion Schulz, Julian Coda-Forno, Seong Joon Oh, Matthias Bethge, and Eric Schulz. Playing repeated games with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16867, 2023. · arXiv
- Chan et al., 2023] Chi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianx- uan Yu, Wei Xue, Shanghang Zhang, Jie Fu, and Zhiyuan Liu. Chateval: Towards better llm-based evaluators through multi- agent debate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07201, 2023. · arXiv
- Chen et al., 2023a] Guangyao Chen, Siwei Dong, et al. Autoa- gents: A framework for automatic agent generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17288, 2023. · arXiv
- Chen et al., 2023b] Huaben Chen, Wenkang Ji, et al. Multi-agent consensus seeking via large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.20151, 2023. · arXiv
- Chen et al., 2023c] Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, et al. Agentverse: Facilitating multi-agent collaboration and exploring emergent be- haviors in agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10848, 2023. · arXiv
- Chen et al., 2023d] Yongchao Chen, Arkin, et al. Scalable multi- robot collaboration with large language models: Centralized or decentralized systems? arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15943, 2023. · arXiv
- Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Jingjing Xu, and Zhi- fang Sui. A survey on in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00234, 2022. · arXiv
- Yihong Dong, Xue Jiang, Zhi Jin, and Ge Li. Self-collaboration code generation via chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07590, 2023. · arXiv
- Yilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Igor Mordatch. Improving factuality and rea- soning in language models through multiagent debate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14325, 2023. · arXiv
- Fan et al., 2023] Caoyun Fan, Jindou Chen, et al. Can large lan- guage models serve as rational players in game theory? a sys- tematic analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.05488, 2023. · arXiv
- J. Doyne Farmer and Robert L. Axtell. Agent-Based Modeling in Economics and Finance: Past, Present, and Future. INET Oxford Working Papers 2022-10, June 2022.
- Gao et al., 2023a] Chen Gao, Xiaochong Lan, et al. S 3 : Social-network simulation system with large language model- empowered agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.14984, 2023. · arXiv
- Gao et al., 2023b] Yunfan Gao, Yun Xiong, Xinyu Gao, Kangx- iang Jia, Jinliu Pan, Yuxi Bi, Yi Dai, Jiawei Sun, and Haofen Wang. Retrieval-augmented generation for large language mod- els: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10997, 2023. · arXiv
- Mor Geva, Daniel Khashabi, Elad Segal, Tushar Khot, Dan Roth, and Jonathan Berant. Did aristotle use a laptop? a question answering benchmark with implicit reasoning strate- gies. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics, 9:346-361, 2021.
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, et al. Mea- suring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300, 2020. · arXiv
- Sirui Hong, Xiawu Zheng, et al. Metagpt: Meta programming for multi-agent collaborative framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00352, 2023. · arXiv
- Hua et al., 2023] Wenyue Hua, Lizhou Fan, Lingyao Li, Kai Mei, Jianchao Ji, Yingqiang Ge, Libby Hemphill, and Yongfeng Zhang. War and peace (waragent): Large language model- based multi-agent simulation of world wars. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17227, 2023. · arXiv
- Huang et al., 2023a] Dong Huang, Qingwen Bu, Jie M Zhang, Michael Luck, and Heming Cui. Agentcoder: Multi-agent-based code generation with iterative testing and optimisation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.13010, 2023. · arXiv
- Huang et al., 2023b] Lei Huang, Weijiang Yu, et al. A sur- vey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05232, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhao Kaiya, Michelangelo Naim, et al. Lyfe agents: Generative agents for low-cost real-time social interac- tions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02172, 2023. · arXiv
- Tushar Khot, Harsh Trivedi, Matthew Fin- layson, Yao Fu, Kyle Richardson, Peter Clark, and Ashish Sab- harwal. Decomposed prompting: A modular approach for solv- ing complex tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02406, 2022. · arXiv
- Kovač et al., 2023] Kovač, Portelas, et al. The socialai school: In- sights from developmental psychology towards artificial socio- cultural agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.07871, 2023. · arXiv
- Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Pik- tus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Hein- rich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:9459-9474, 2020.
- Lex and Schedl, 2022] Elisabeth Lex and Markus Schedl. Psychology-informed recommender systems: A human-centric perspective on recommender systems. CHIIR '22. ACM, 2022.
- Li et al., 2023a] Chao Li, Xing Su, et al. Quantifying the impact of large language models on collective opinion dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03313, 2023. · arXiv
- Li et al., 2023b] Guohao Li, Hammoud, et al. Camel: Commu- nicative agents for" mind" exploration of large scale language model society. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17760, 2023. · arXiv
- Li et al., 2023c] Huao Li, Yu Quan Chong, Simon Stepputtis, Joseph Campbell, Dana Hughes, Michael Lewis, and Katia Sycara. Theory of mind for multi-agent collaboration via large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10701, 2023. · arXiv
- Li et al., 2023d] Minghao Li, Yingxiu Zhao, Bowen Yu, Feifan Song, Hangyu Li, Haiyang Yu, Zhoujun Li, Fei Huang, and Yongbin Li. Api-bank: A comprehensive benchmark for tool- augmented llms. In The 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2023.
- Li et al., 2023e] Nian Li, Chen Gao, Yong Li, and Qingmin Liao. Large language model-empowered agents for simulating macroe- conomic activities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10436, 2023. · arXiv
- Li et al., 2023f] Siyu Li, Jin Yang, et al. Are you in a masquer- ade? exploring the behavior and impact of large language model driven social bots in online social networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10337, 2023. · arXiv
- Li et al., 2023g] Yang Li, Yangyang Yu, Haohang Li, Zhi Chen, and Khaldoun Khashanah. Tradinggpt: Multi-agent system with layered memory and distinct characters for enhanced financial trading performance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03736, 2023. · arXiv
- Li et al., 2023h] Yuan Li, Yixuan Zhang, et al. Metaagents: Simulating interactions of human behaviors for llm-based task- oriented coordination via collaborative generative agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06500, 2023. · arXiv
- Light et al., 2023a] Jonathan Light, Min Cai, et al. From text to tactic: Evaluating llms playing the game of avalon. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05036, 2023. · arXiv
- Light et al., 2023b] Jonathan Light, Min Cai, Sheng Shen, and Ziniu Hu. Avalonbench: Evaluating llms playing the game of avalon. In NeurIPS 2023 Foundation Models for Decision Mak- ing Workshop, 2023.
- Zijun Liu, Yanzhe Zhang, et al. Dynamic llm- agent network: An llm-agent collaboration framework with agent team optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02170, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhao Mandi, Shreeya Jain, and Shuran Song. Roco: Dialectic multi-robot collaboration with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04738, 2023. · arXiv
- Mao et al., 2023] Shaoguang Mao, Yuzhe Cai, et al. Alympics: Language agents meet game theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.03220, 2023. · arXiv
- Gabriel Mukobi, Hannah Erlebach, et al. Welfare diplomacy: Benchmarking language model cooperation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08901, 2023. · arXiv
- Nathalia Nascimento, Paulo Alencar, and Donald Cowan. Self-adaptive large language model (llm)-based multiagent systems. In ACSOS-C, pages 104-109. IEEE, 2023.
- Navid, Majumdar, et al. Generative agent- based modeling: Unveiling social system dynamics through cou- pling mechanistic models with generative artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11456, 2023. · arXiv
- Joon Sung Park, Lindsay Popowski, et al. Social simulacra: Creating populated prototypes for social computing systems. In UIST, pages 1-18, 2022.
- Joon Sung Park, Joseph C O'Brien, et al. Gen- erative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03442, 2023. · arXiv
- Chen Qian, Xin Cong, Cheng Yang, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Juyuan Xu, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. Communicative agents for software development. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.07924, 2023. · arXiv
- Ruan et al., 2023] Jingqing Ruan, Yihong Chen, Bin Zhang, Zhi- wei Xu, Tianpeng Bao, Guoqing Du, Shiwei Shi, Hangyu Mao, Ziyue Li, Xingyu Zeng, et al. Tptu: large language model- based ai agents for task planning and tool usage. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03427, 2023. · arXiv
- Theodore R Sumers, Shunyu Yao, et al. Cognitive architectures for language agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.02427, 2023. · arXiv
- Wang et al., 2023c] Shenzhi Wang, Chang Liu, et al. Avalon's game of thoughts: Battle against deception through recursive contemplation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01320, 2023. · arXiv
- Ross Williams, Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, et al. Epidemic modeling with generative agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04986, 2023. · arXiv
- Qingyun Wu, Gagan Bansal, et al. Autogen: En- abling next-gen llm applications via multi-agent conversation framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08155, 2023. · arXiv
- Bushi Xiao, Ziyuan Yin, et al. Simulating public administration crisis: A novel generative agent-based simulation system to lower technology barriers in social science research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06957, 2023. · arXiv
- Tianbao Xie, Fan Zhou, et al. Openagents: An open platform for language agents in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10634, 2023. · arXiv
- Xu et al., 2023b] Yuzhuang Xu, Shuo Wang, et al. Exploring large language models for communication games: An empirical study on werewolf. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.04658, 2023. · arXiv
- Xu et al., 2023c] Zelai Xu, Chao Yu, et al. Language agents with reinforcement learning for strategic play in the werewolf game. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.18940, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhang et al., 2023a] An Zhang, Leheng Sheng, Yuxin Chen, Hao Li, Yang Deng, Xiang Wang, and Tat-Seng Chua. On generative agents in recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10108, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhang et al., 2023b] Ceyao Zhang, Kaijie Yang, et al. Proagent: Building proactive cooperative ai with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11339, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhang et al., 2023c] Hongxin Zhang, Weihua Du, et al. Build- ing cooperative embodied agents modularly with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02485, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhiling Zheng, Oufan Zhang, et al. Chatgpt research group for optimizing the crystallinity of mofs and cofs. ACS Central Science, 9(11):2161-2170, 2023.
- Zhou et al., 2023a] Wangchunshu Zhou, Yuchen Eleanor Jiang, et al. Agents: An open-source framework for autonomous lan- guage agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07870, 2023. · arXiv
- Zhou et al., 2023b] Xuhui Zhou, Hao Zhu, Leena Mathur, Ruo- hong Zhang, Haofei Yu, Zhengyang Qi, Louis-Philippe Morency, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, Graham Neubig, et al. Sotopia: Interactive evaluation for social intelligence in language agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11667, 2023. · arXiv
- Caleb Ziems, Omar Shaikh, et al. Can large language models transform computational social science? Com- putational Linguistics, pages 1-53, 2023.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey on LLM-based multi-agent systems: Workflow, infrastructure, and challenges
Li, X., Wang, S., Zeng, S., Wu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024) · Vicinagearth · doi:10.1007/s44336-024-00009-2 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Empowering biomedical discovery with AI agents
Gao, S., Fang, A., Huang, Y., Giunchiglia, V., Noori, A., Schwarz, J. R., Ektefaie, Y., Kondic, J., & Zitnik, M. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.022 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents
Zhang, Z., Dai, Q., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3748302 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the creativity of large language models
Franceschelli, G., & Musolesi, M. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02127-3 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populations
Ashery, A. F., Aiello, L. M., & Baronchelli, A. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adu9368 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Hagendorff, T., Dasgupta, I., Binz, M., Chan, S. C. Y., Lampinen, A., Wang, J. X., Akata, Z., & Schulz, E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.13988 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Yigit, Y., Ferrag, M. A., Ghanem, M. C., Sarker, I. H., Maglaras, L. A., Chrysoulas, C., Moradpoor, N., Tihanyi, N., & Janicke, H. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25061666 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Rethinking clinical trials for medical AI with dynamic deployments of adaptive systems
Rosenthal, J. T., Beecy, A., & Sabuncu, M. R. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01674-3 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Agentic AI Frameworks in SMMEs: A Systematic Literature Review of Ecosystemic Interconnected Agents
Olujimi, P. A., Owolawi, P. A., Mogase, R. C., & Wyk, E. V. (2025) · doi:10.20944/preprints202504.1797.v1 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
A feasibility study of automating radiotherapy planning with large language model agents
Wang, Q., Wang, Z., Li, M., Ni, X., Tan, R., Zhang, W., Wubulaishan, M., Wang, W., Yuan, Z., Zhang, Z., et al. (2025) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/adbff1 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs
Tran, K.-T., Dao, D., Nguyen, M.-D., Pham, Q.-V., O'Sullivan, B., & Nguyen, H. D. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.06322 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Inherent and emergent liability issues in LLM-based agentic systems: a principal-agent perspective
Gabison, G. A., & Xian, R. P. (2025) · Proceedings of the 1st Workshop for Research on Agent Language Models (REALM 2025) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.realm-1.9 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agents
Wang, H., Poskitt, C. M., & Sun, J. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 IEEE/ACM 48th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3744916.3764546 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Li, X., Shi, W., Zhang, H., Peng, C., Wu, S., & Tong, W. (2025) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2025.06.027 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Conformity in large language models
Zhu, X., Zhang, C., Stafford, T., Collier, N., & Vlachos, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.195 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Ethical issues in multi-agent AI systems for healthcare: a narrative review
Xie, Z., Wang, H., Dai, L., Wang, Z., Song, H., & Qian, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1792627 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Experience-guided multi-agent interpretable framework for radiology report summarization
Li, J., Zhou, T., Zhou, Z., Wei, X., Song, H., Wang, Z., Chen, Y., & Lv, H. (2026) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.109078 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Cooperative Scheduling and Hierarchical Memory Model for Multi-Agent Systems
Zou, H., Li, R., Sun, T., Wang, F., Li, T., & Liu, K. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering - Asia (ISPCE-ASIA) · doi:10.1109/ispce-asia64773.2024.10756271 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Demystifying Multi-Agent Debate: The Role of Confidence and Diversity
Zhu, X., Zhang, C., Chi, Y., Stafford, T., Collier, N., & Vlachos, A. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1694 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Model Swarms: Collaborative Search to Adapt LLM Experts via Swarm Intelligence
Feng, S., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Ebrahimi, S., Palangi, H., Miculicich, L., Kulshrestha, A., Rauschmayr, N., Choi, Y., Tsvetkov, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.11163 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems
Kim, Y., Gu, K., Park, C., Park, C., Schmidgall, S., Heydari, A. A., Yan, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhuang, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.08296 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Wu, M., & Ouyang, F. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-026-10211-x
SEMA-RAG: A Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Medical Reasoning
Huang, Y., Chen, R., & Cheng, J. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.917
MS-Eval: Benchmarking Sub-Agent Delegation and Orchestration in MCP-Intensive Working Scenarios
Ding, B., Wang, Q., Ruan, L., Lu, W., Ge, Q., Fang, R., & Lin, T. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.22869
Shen, X., Liu, Y., Dai, Y., Wang, Y., Miao, R., Tan, Y., Pan, S., & Wang, X. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.23352 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationSmart Book Seeker: Agent-Augmented Retrieval System for Metadata-Sparse Libraries
Liu, H.-Q., & Fan, Y.-C. (2026) · Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026 · doi:10.1145/3774905.3795723
Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities
Bei, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, S., Chen, W., Zhou, S., Chen, H., Li, Y., Bu, J., Pan, S., Yu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.18019
- Authors
- Guo, T., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Chang, R., Pei, S., Chawla, N. V., Wiest, O., & Zhang, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
- Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Independent Researcher
- University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Thirty-ThirdInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2024-08
- Pages
- 8048-8057
- OpenAlex
- W4401023556
- Cited by
- 851
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 442 · 2025: 336 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 204.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2202693)
- Division of Chemistry (CHE- 2202693, 2202693)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- large language models, multi-agent systems, LLM agents, autonomous agents, agent communication, world simulation, multi-agent planning, reasoning, benchmark dataset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review