The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chain-of-Thought Enhanced Content Detection in Large Language Models
Abstract
This paper proposes and explores a content detection method for large language models based on the Chain of Thought (CoT) logic chain. By incrementally extracting logic chains from text or code and converting them into feature vectors, this method enables logical plagiarism detection and content verification for complex tasks. Particularly for classical algorithmic problems, such as dynamic programming, this approach effectively mitigates plagiarism attempts through variable renaming. The paper first delves into the theoretical foundation of CoT logic chains and analyzes their application mechanisms within large language models. It then provides a detailed account of the steps for feature extraction and similarity detection algorithms, including how to efficiently convert logic chains into feature vectors for comparison. To validate the effectiveness of this method, several classical algorithmic instances were selected for experimentation. Results indicate that the CoT logic chain-based content detection method offers significant advantages in detecting originality in academic papers and code. This approach not only substantially improves the detection rate of academic misconduct but also assists editors and reviewers in more accurately identifying AI-generated content, thereby holding broad applications in academic publishing, code review, and educational fields. Additionally, the paper discusses the potential application of this method in other domains, such as patent plagi…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To address this, Zou et al. (2024) proposed a new method employing Chain of Thought (CoT) 7 that allows for rapid and accurate analysis by progressively breaking down problems into smaller components.”
From Generative AI and intellectual property: a systematic literature review of possible issues and mitigations (2026) · cites this paper as Zou et al. (2024)
Citations
Cites
Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6 · Cited by 1,099
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Luchen, 2023, Research on Content Detection Generated by Large Language Model and the Mechanism of Bypassing, Journal of Information Security Research, 9, 524
- Zhiwu, 2024, Detecting ChatGPT Generated Texts Based on Deep Pyramid Convolutional Neural Network, Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 8, 14
- Xibin, 2023, Research on the Detection of AI-Generated Academic Journal Texts, Science-Technology & Publication, 8, 56
- Chopra, 2020, Mastering Python Natural Language Processing
- Feng, 2023, Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical Perspective
Cited by
Arnaudo, A., Coppola, R., Morisio, M., Vetrò, A., Borghi, M., Raso, R., & Khan, B. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3928 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Zou, C., Feng, Z., Guan, H., & Xing, C.
- Affiliations
- School of Computer Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Institute of Technology,Harbin,China
- Venue
- 2024 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, Big Data Application and Software Engineering (CBASE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-10-11
- Pages
- 610-617
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chain-of-Thought Enhanced Content Detection in Large Language Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cbase64041.2024.10824407
- The paper
- Zou, C., Feng, Z., Guan, H., & Xing, C. (2024). Chain-of-Thought Enhanced Content Detection in Large Language Models. 2024 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, Big Data Application and Software Engineering (CBASE). https://doi.org/10.1109/cbase64041.2024.10824407