Cited by 13Control Systems and IdentificationOptimal Experimental Design MethodsStatistical and numerical algorithms

An identification test monitoring procedure for MIMO systems based on statistical uncertainty estimation

Martin, Cesar A., Rivera, Daniel E., Hekler, Eric B.·2015·2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)

Abstract

This paper presents an identification test monitoring procedure for multivariable systems whose purpose is to define an experiment that is both sufficiently informative for identification purposes and of the shortest duration possible, given predefined levels of accuracy in the model. The procedure relies on uncertainty regions resulting from frequency-domain transfer function estimation that is performed during experimental execution. To obtain independent-in-frequency signals for estimation, input design relying on multi-sinusoidal signals with “zippered” power spectra is developed. Given the various approaches available for computing statistically-based uncertainty in the frequency domain, the method that offers the most general conditions with the least a priori information about the output noise structure is selected. Based on the computed uncertainties and user-defined bounds, a stopping criterion for the identification test is developed. Results are evaluated with a simulation study involving a representative process model. This includes a performance evaluation of the technique under various distinct noise models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cdc.2015.7402627

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The micro-randomized trial is a sequential factorial design for modeling effectiveness of treatment components over time.

    “The micro-randomized trial is a sequential factorial design for modeling effectiveness of treatment components over time.”
  • The micro-randomized trial can be used to test proximal main effects of components over time, time-varying moderation, and, with variations in study design based on system identification, the development of idiographic computational models.

    “It can be used to test proximal main effects of components over time, time-varying moderation [16], and with variations in study design based on strategies from system identification, the development of idiographic computational models [17, 18].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, C. A., Rivera, D. E., & Hekler, E. B.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-12
Pages
2719-2724
ISSN
0191-2216 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2289697244
Cited by
13
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.74
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
Keywords
MIMO system identification, uncertainty regions, stopping rules, multivariable systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review