Cited by 44Machine Learning in HealthcareAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

HCNN: Heterogeneous Convolutional Neural Networks for Comorbid Risk Prediction with Electronic Health Records

Zhang, Jinghe, Gong, Jiaqi, Barnes, Laura·2017·2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE)

Abstract

The increasing adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems has brought tremendous opportunities in medicine enabling more personalized prognostic models. However, most work to date has investigated the binary classification problem for predicting the onset of one chronic disease, but little attention has been given to assessing risk of developing comorbidities that are major causes of morbidity and mortality. For example, type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease frequently accompany congestive heart failure. This paper is motivated by the problem of predicting comorbid diseases and aims to answer the following question: can we predict the comorbid risk using a patient's medical history? We propose a new predictive learning framework, Heterogeneous Convolutional Neural Network (HCNN), that represents EHRs as graphs with heterogeneous attributes (e.g. diagnoses, procedures, and medication), and then develop a novel deep learning methodology for risk prediction of multiple comorbid diseases. The main innovation of the framework is that it defines the distance between the heterogeneous attributes of the graph representation extracted from the EHR and develops an appropriate learning infrastructure that is a composition of sparse convolutional layers and local pooling steps that match with the local structure of the space of the heterogeneous attributes. As a result, the new method is capable of capturing features about the relationships between heterogeneous attributes of the graphs. Through a comparative study on patient EHR data, HCNN achieves better performance than traditional convolutional neural networks on the risk prediction of comorbid diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/chase.2017.80

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., Gong, J., & Barnes, L.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Venue
2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
214-221
ISSN
2832-2967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2750342792
Cited by
44
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/ACM Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
electronic health records, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review