PreprintCited by 1,255Advanced Graph Neural NetworksNeural Networks and ApplicationsTopological and Geometric Data Analysis

Deep Convolutional Networks on Graph-Structured Data

Open access
Henaff, Mikael, Bruna, Joan, LeCun, Yann·2015·arXiv

Abstract

Deep Learning's recent successes have mostly relied on Convolutional Networks, which exploit fundamental statistical properties of images, sounds and video data: the local stationarity and multi-scale compositional structure, that allows expressing long range interactions in terms of shorter, localized interactions. However, there exist other important examples, such as text documents or bioinformatic data, that may lack some or all of these strong statistical regularities. In this paper we consider the general question of how to construct deep architectures with small learning complexity on general non-Euclidean domains, which are typically unknown and need to be estimated from the data. In particular, we develop an extension of Spectral Networks which incorporates a Graph Estimation procedure, that we test on large-scale classification problems, matching or improving over Dropout Networks with far less parameters to estimate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1506.05163

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methods in [19] and [20] require eigenvalue decomposition, so their time complexity is O(n^3).

    “As methods in [19] and [20] require eigenvalue decomposition, the time complexity is O ( n 3 ) .”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

  • Henaff et al. show that performing a simple max/mean pooling at the beginning of the network is especially important to reduce the dimensionality in the graph domain and mitigate the cost of the expensive graph Fourier transform operation.

    “Henaff et al. [20] show that performing a simple max/mean pooling at the beginning of the network is especially important to reduce the dimensionality in the graph domain and mitigate the cost of the expensive graph Fourier transform operation.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henaff, M., Bruna, J., & LeCun, Y.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W637153065
Cited by
1,255
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 258 · 2020: 252 · 2019: 193 · 2018: 120 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
Keywords
graph neural networks, deep convolutional neural networks, graph-structured data, spectral networks, graph estimation, graph classification, parameter efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review