Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,880

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ant Colony Optimization

Open access
Dorigo, Marco, Birattari, Mauro, Stutzle, Thomas·2006·IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine

Abstract

The introduction of ant colony optimization (ACO) and to survey its most notable applications are discussed. Ant colony optimization takes inspiration from the forging behavior of some ant species. These ants deposit Pheromone on the ground in order to mark some favorable path that should be followed by other members of the colony. The model proposed by Deneubourg and co-workers for explaining the foraging behavior of ants is the main source of inspiration for the development of ant colony optimization. In ACO a number of artificial ants build solutions to an optimization problem and exchange information on their quality through a communication scheme that is reminiscent of the one adopted by real ants. ACO algorithms is introduced and all ACO algorithms share the same idea and the ACO is formalized into a meta-heuristics for combinatorial problems. It is foreseeable that future research on ACO will focus more strongly on rich optimization problems that include stochasticity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ci-m.2006.248054

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dorigo, M., Birattari, M., & Stutzle, T.
Venue
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine
Published
2006-11
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
28-39
ISSN
1556-603X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1530490667
Cited by
1,880
References
5
FWCI
47.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.