Cited by 16Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityData Management and Algorithms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Next - Location Prediction Using Federated Learning on a Blockchain

Halim, Sadaf MD, Khan, Latifur, Thuraisingham, Bhavani·2020·2020 IEEE Second International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI)

Abstract

Mobile devices are a rich source of sensitive location data. In this paper, we propose a method for harnessing this data to provide better location predictions without sacrificing the privacy of the users generating this data. To this end, we propose utilizing Federated Learning to train locally on a user's mobile device, while simultaneously identifying and combatting the possibility of bad actors or adversaries that may deliberately report problematic data to hurt the training process. Furthermore, we propose using a blockchain instead of a centralized server for the training process, to ensure that the process is secure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cogmi50398.2020.00038

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. masud, 2011, Data Mining Tools for Malware Detection
  2. 10.1145/1032604.1032621 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/1722080.1722093 · DOI
  4. huang, 2019, A Hierarchical Location Prediction Neural Network for Twitter User Geolocation
  5. krishna, 2018, An LSTMBased System for Prediction of Human Activities with Durations, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 10.1145/3161201 · DOI
  6. yen, 2002, A Component-based Approach for Embedded Software Development, Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing
  7. 10.1109/DEXA.2002.1045883 · DOI
  8. boeing, 2018, Clustering to reduce spatial data set size
  9. 10.1016/S0888-613X(96)00074-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/1526709.1526816 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/1409635.1409677 · DOI · Paper page
  12. crivellari, 2020, LSTM-Based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Individual Mobility Traces of Short-Term Foreign Tourists, 12
  13. 10.1109/LCOMM.2019.2921755 · DOI · Paper page
  14. zhao, 2019, Privacy-Preserving Blockchain-Based Federated Learning for IoT Devices, IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  15. 10.1109/Blockchain.2019.00057 · DOI · Paper page
  16. buterin, 0, Ethereum Whitepaper
  17. blanchard, 0, Machine Learning with Adversaries: Byzantine Tolerant Gradient Descent, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017)
  18. el mhamdi, 2018, The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantium, International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)
  19. damaskinos, 2019, AGGREGATHOR: Byzantine Machine Learning via Robust Gradient Aggregation, SysML
  20. syeda, 2009, Software Fault Localization Using N-gram Analysis, International Conference on Wireless Algorithms Systems and Applications
  21. wang, 2020, Federated Learning with Matched Averaging, International Conference on Learning Representations
  22. 10.1145/3378679.3394533 · DOI · Paper page
  23. mohri, 2019, Agnostic federated learning, International Conference on Machine Learning, 4615
  24. 10.1109/P2P.2013.6688704 · DOI
  25. hard, 2018, Federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction
  26. nakamoto, 0, Bitcoin A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
  27. 10.1109/CSCWD.2018.8465289 · DOI
  28. 2012, GeoLife GPS Trajectories
  29. li, 2020, Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks, Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems 2
  30. mcmahan, 0, Federated learning Collaborative machine learning without centralized training data
  31. el-mhamdi, 0, Fast and secure distributed learning in high dimension
  32. olah, 2015, Understanding LSTM Networks
  33. 10.1145/3052973.3053034 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00778-006-0002-5 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/11681878_14 · DOI · Paper page
  36. geyer, 0, Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspective, Proc of NIPS Workshops 2017
  37. naseri, 2020, Toward Robustness and Privacy in Federated Learning Experimenting with Local and Central Differential Privacy

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Halim, S. M., Khan, L., & Thuraisingham, B.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE Second International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-10
Pages
244-250
OpenAlex
W3121241170
Cited by
16
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF (DMS-1737978,DGE-2039542,OAC-1828467,OAC-1931541,DGE-1906630)
  • IBM faculty award (Research)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Management and Algorithms
Keywords
location prediction, federated learning, blockchain, privacy-preserving machine learning, mobile phone location data, adversarial data, decentralized learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review