Cited by 45Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

A Systematic Literature Review of Medical Chatbot Research from a Behavior Change Perspective

Gentner, Tobias, Neitzel, Timon, Schulze, Jacob, Buettner, Ricardo·2020·2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)

Abstract

From a perspective of behavioral change, we review medical chatbot literature included in top peer-reviewed journals and conferences, and build up a comprehensive picture. We examine literature on how people feel about using a medical chatbot and based on that how far chatbots are useful to change harmful behavior. To structure the review we use the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Based on this we conclude five design-oriented recommendations. We expect this research to identify behavioral aspects that contribute to the acceptance, usage and effectiveness of medical chatbots in future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/compsac48688.2020.0-172

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest chatbots have high potential for healthcare and psychiatric use, such as promoting antipsychotic medication adherence and reducing stress, anxiety, and/or depression symptoms.

    “Results from a few systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that chatbots have a high potential for healthcare and psychiatric use, such as promoting antipsychotic medication adherence as well as reducing stress, anxiety, and/or depression symptoms [1, 25, 26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

18 of the 98 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gentner, T., Neitzel, T., Schulze, J., & Buettner, R.
Affiliations
Hochschule Aalen (DE)
Venue
2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-07
Pages
735-740
ISSN
0730-3157 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3088057567
Cited by
45
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Aalen University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
healthcare chatbots, behavior change, theory of planned behavior, theory of reasoned action, user acceptance, chatbot design, harmful behavior, health behavior interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review