Cited by 43Smoking Behavior and CessationAI in Service InteractionsSpeech and dialogue systems

Social Network Chatbots for Smoking Cessation: Agent and Multi-Agent Frameworks

Calvaresi, Davide, Calbimonte, Jean-Paul, Dubosson, Fabien, Najjar, Amro, Schumacher, Michael·2019·IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence

Abstract

Asynchronous messaging is leading human-machine interaction due to the boom of mobile devices and social networks. The recent release of dedicated APIs from messaging platforms boosted the development of computer programs able to conduct conversations, (i.e., chatbots), which have been adopted in several domain-specific contexts. This paper proposes SMAG: a chatbot framework supporting a smoking cessation program (JDF) deployed on a social network. In particular, it details the single-agent implementation, the campaign results, a multi-agent design for SMAG enabling the modelization of personalized behavior and user profiling, and highlighting of coupling chatbot technology with and multi-agent systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3350546.3352532

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 15 studies, 4 (27%) assessed efficacy of AI chatbots in smoking cessation.

    “Out of the 15 studies, 4 (27%) studies [23-25,27] assessed the efficacy of AI chatbots in smoking cessation.”
  • Calvaresi et al reported that 28.9% of participants completed their smoking cessation goal 3 months after the last cigarette, which was 10% higher than the previous edition of the smoking cessation program without chatbot support.

    “Calvaresi et al [27] reported that 28.9% of the participants completed their smoking cessation goal 3 months after the last cigarette. This result was 10% higher than that of the previous edition of the smoking cessation program, which did not include chatbot support.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calvaresi, D., Calbimonte, J.-P., Dubosson, F., Najjar, A., & Schumacher, M.
Affiliations
  • HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH)
  • Umeå University (SE)
Venue
IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-10-14
Pages
286-292
OpenAlex
W2980406972
Cited by
43
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
34.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
chatbots, smoking cessation, multi-agent systems, user profiling, health behavior change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review