Cited by 56Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

Decentralised Image Sharing and Copyright Protection using Blockchain and Perceptual Hashes

Mehta, Rishabh, Kapoor, Naman, Sourav, Soumya, Shorey, Rajeev·2019·2019 11th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS)

Abstract

In this paper, we aim to address the major problem of correct image attribution for photos being uploaded on the stock photo websites and peer-to-peer image sharing marketplaces, ensuring that original photographers are rightfully recognized and credited for their works. There are now millions of royalty-free images being shared every week on stock photo websites. There is a major discontent among photographers and graphics designers who share images on such websites regarding a widespread malpractice where others try to take credit for and benefit from original author's work. This happens when someone other than the original author uploads the same image as one already shared on the marketplace or uses image processing methods such as rotation, cropping, gray scale conversion etc and then uploads this tampered image to avoid copyright violation detection. To counter such problems, we propose a decentralised peer-to-peer photo sharing marketplace built on top of Ethereum test chain and demonstrate how it is fair, trustworthy and practical. Our decentralised application leverages perceptual hashes and robust smart contracts of Ethereum to automatically detect and reject tampered images that are perceptually similar to images already present on the marketplace. Due to inherent properties of Blockchain, our marketplace has no central authority controlling it, no third party interference, no single point of failure, zero-censorship and preserves online user privacy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that provides a practical solution for automatically detecting and rejecting perceptually similar images on a decentralised image sharing platform, thus protecting the copyrights of genuine image authors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comsnets.2019.8711440

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehta, R., Kapoor, N., Sourav, S., & Shorey, R.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
  • Delhi Technological University (IN)
Venue
2019 11th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-01
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2945633032
Cited by
55
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
image copyright protection, image attribution, perceptual hashing, blockchain, Ethereum smart contracts, image forgery detection, decentralized applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review