Cited by 2Advanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesChaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionBlockchain Technology Applications and Security

A Blockchain and Improved Perception Hash Based Copyright Protection Scheme for Purely Chromatic Background Images

Gao, Guangyong, Feng, Tongchao, Guo, Chongtao, Xia, Zhihua, Shi, Yun-Qing·2025·IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

Abstract

Purely chromatic background images are widely used in computer wallpapers and advertisements, leading to issues such as copyright infringement and the loss of interest of holders. Image hashing is a technique used for comparing the similarity between images, and is often used for image verification, search, and copy detection due to its insensitivity to subtle changes in the original image. In a purely chromatic background image, the central detail of the image is the primary part and the key for copyright authentication. As the perception hash (pHash) algorithm only retains the low-frequency portion of the discrete cosine transform (DCT) matrix, it is unsuitable for purely chromatic background images. To deal with this issue, we propose an improved perception hash (ipHash) algorithm to enhance the universality of the algorithm by extracting purely chromatic background image features. Meanwhile, the development of image hashing is restricted due to the requirement of a trusted third party. To solve this issue, a secure blockchain-based image copyright protection scheme is designed. It realizes the copyright authentication and traceability, and overcomes the issue of a lack of trusted third parties. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-theart image copyright protection schemes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmm.2025.3586150

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Gao, G., Feng, T., Guo, C., Xia, Z., & Shi, Y.-Q.
Affiliations
  • Engineering Research Center of Digital Forensics, Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
  • Jinan University (CN)
  • New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
Published
2025
Volume
27
Pages
6635-6647
ISSN
  • 1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0077
OpenAlex
W4412164382
Cited by
2
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Humanities and Social Science Foun-dation of Ministry of Education, China (24YJA870002)
  • National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2022YFB3103100)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62122032, U23B2023)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
image copyright protection, blockchain, image hashing, copyright authentication, discrete cosine transform, copy detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review