The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fundamental Green Tradeoffs: Progresses, Challenges, and Impacts on 5G Networks
Open accessAbstract
With years of tremendous traffic and energy consumption growth, green radio has been valued not only for theoretical research interests but also for the operational expenditure reduction and the sustainable development of wireless communications. Fundamental green tradeoffs, served as an important framework for analysis, include four basic relationships: spectrum efficiency versus energy efficiency; deployment efficiency versus energy efficiency; delay versus power; and bandwidth versus power. In this paper, we first provide a comprehensive overview on the extensive on-going research efforts and categorize them based on the fundamental green tradeoffs. We will then focus on research progresses of 4G and 5G communications, such as orthogonal frequency division multiplexing and non-orthogonal aggregation, multiple input multiple output, and heterogeneous networks. We will also discuss potential challenges and impacts of fundamental green tradeoffs, to shed some light on the energy efficient research and design for future wireless networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Energy and spectral efficiency of very large multiuser MIMO systems
Ngo, H. Q., Larsson, E. G., & Marzetta, T. L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2013.020413.110848 · Cited by 3,173
A Survey of 5G Network: Architecture and Emerging Technologies
Gupta, A., & Jha, R. K. (2015) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2015.2461602 · Cited by 2,420
(2010) · doi:10.5555/1855711.1855728 · Cited by 970
Energy-Efficient Cooperative Relaying over Fading Channels with Simple Relay Selection
Madan, R., Mehta, N., Molisch, A., & Zhang, J. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2008.06090 · Cited by 380
Spectral and energy efficiency of ultra-dense networks under different deployment strategies
Yunas, S., Valkama, M., & Niemelä, J. (2015) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2015.7010521 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Toward Smart Wireless Communications via Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces: A Contemporary Survey
Gong, S., Lu, X., Hoang, D. T., Niyato, D., Shu, L., Kim, D. I., & Liang, Y.-C. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.3004197 · Cited by 1,035
Spectral and Energy-Efficient Wireless Powered IoT Networks: NOMA or TDMA?
Wu, Q., Chen, W., Ng, D. W. K., & Schober, R. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2018.2799947 · Cited by 253
Self-citationSharma, S. K., Bogale, T. E., Le, L. B., Chatzinotas, S., Wang, X., & Ottersten, B. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2773628 · Cited by 248
Zhong, X., Yin, H., He, Y., & Huang, Y. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2767061 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S., Wu, Q., Xu, S., & Li, G. Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-56
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2343823234
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fundamental Green Tradeoffs: Progresses, Challenges, and Impacts on 5G Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2016.2594120
- The paper
- Zhang, S., Wu, Q., Xu, S., & Li, G. Y. (2017). Fundamental Green Tradeoffs: Progresses, Challenges, and Impacts on 5G Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2016.2594120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.