The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anomaly Detection in Blockchain Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
Abstract
Over the past decade, blockchain technology has attracted a huge attention from both industry and academia because it can be integrated with a large number of everyday applications of modern information and communication technologies (ICT). Peer-to-peer (P2P) architecture of blockchain enhances these applications by providing strong security and trust-oriented guarantees, such as immutability, verifiability, and decentralization. Despite these incredible features that blockchain technology brings to these ICT applications, recent research has indicated that the strong guarantees are not sufficient enough and blockchain networks may still be prone to various security, privacy, and reliability issues. In order to overcome these issues, it is important to identify the anomalous behaviour within the actionable time frame. In this article, we provide an in-depth survey regarding integration of anomaly detection models in blockchain technology. For this, we first discuss how anomaly detection can aid in ensuring security of blockchain based applications. Then, we demonstrate certain fundamental evaluation metrics and key requirements that can play a critical role while developing anomaly detection models for blockchain. Afterwards, we present a thorough survey of various anomaly detection models from the perspective of each layer of blockchain. Finally, we conclude the article by highlighting certain important challenges alongside discussing how they can serve as future research directions for new researchers in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A survey of network anomaly detection techniques
Ahmed, M., Naser Mahmood, A., & Hu, J. (2016) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2015.11.016 · Cited by 1,750
Network Anomaly Detection: Methods, Systems and Tools
Bhuyan, M. H., Bhattacharyya, D. K., & Kalita, J. K. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00046 · Cited by 1,348
Applications of Blockchains in the Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey
Ali, M. S., Vecchio, M., Pincheira, M., Dolui, K., Antonelli, F., & Rehmani, M. H. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2886932 · Cited by 855
Self-citationA Comprehensive Survey on Attacks, Security Issues and Blockchain Solutions for IoT and IIoT
Sengupta, J., Ruj, S., & Das Bit, S. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2019.102481 · Cited by 844
A Survey of Distributed Consensus Protocols for Blockchain Networks
Xiao, Y., Zhang, N., Lou, W., & Hou, Y. T. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2969706 · Cited by 841
A Survey of Blockchain Technology Applied to Smart Cities: Research Issues and Challenges
Xie, J., Tang, H., Huang, T., Yu, F. R., Xie, R., Liu, J., & Liu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2899617 · Cited by 764
Big data preprocessing: methods and prospects
García, S., Ramírez-Gallego, S., Luengo, J., Benítez, J. M., & Herrera, F. (2016) · Big Data Analytics · doi:10.1186/s41044-016-0014-0 · Cited by 709
Integrated Blockchain and Edge Computing Systems: A Survey, Some Research Issues and Challenges
Yang, R., Yu, F. R., Si, P., Yang, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2894727 · Cited by 688
Survey on Anomaly Detection using Data Mining Techniques
Agrawal, S., & Agrawal, J. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.220 · Cited by 595
Differential Privacy Techniques for Cyber Physical Systems: A Survey
Hassan, M. U., Rehmani, M. H., & Chen, J. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2944748 · Cited by 564
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ul Hassan, M., Rehmani, M. H., & Chen, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 289-318
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- 2373-745X
- OpenAlex
- W4200629745
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 97
- FWCI
- 54.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anomaly Detection in Blockchain Networks: A Comprehensive Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2022.3205643
- The paper
- Ul Hassan, M., Rehmani, M. H., & Chen, J. (2023). Anomaly Detection in Blockchain Networks: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2022.3205643
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.