Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Network Anomaly Detection: Methods, Systems and Tools

Bhuyan, Monowar H., Bhattacharyya, D. K., Kalita, J. K.·2014·IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

Abstract

Network anomaly detection is an important and dynamic research area. Many network intrusion detection methods and systems (NIDS) have been proposed in the literature. In this paper, we provide a structured and comprehensive overview of various facets of network anomaly detection so that a researcher can become quickly familiar with every aspect of network anomaly detection. We present attacks normally encountered by network intrusion detection systems. We categorize existing network anomaly detection methods and systems based on the underlying computational techniques used. Within this framework, we briefly describe and compare a large number of network anomaly detection methods and systems. In addition, we also discuss tools that can be used by network defenders and datasets that researchers in network anomaly detection can use. We also highlight research directions in network anomaly detection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00046

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 209

  1. 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.046 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/MCAS.2006.1688199 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.csi.2007.07.008 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.inffus.2006.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1007/978-3-540-76929-3_24 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/ICDM.2010.140 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cose.2004.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/ISCC.2010.5546735 · DOI
  9. naldurg, 2004, A Temporal Logic Based Framework for Intrusion Detection, Proc IFIP WG 6 1 Int Conf Formal Techn Netw Distrib Syst, 359
  10. 10.1109/IWIAS.2003.1192454 · DOI
  11. kayacik, 2005, Selecting Features for Intrusion Detection: A Feature Relevance Analysis on KDD 99 Intrusion Detection Datasets, Proc 3rd Annual Conf Privacy Security Trust
  12. heady, 1990, The Architecture of a Network Level Intrusion Detection System, Tech Rep TR-90
  13. zhang, 2001, HIDE: a Hierarchical Network Intrusion Detection System Using Statistical Preprocessing and Neural Network Classification, IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Information Assurance Workshop
  14. daniel, 2001, ADAM: a testbed for exploring the use of data mining in intrusion detection, ACM SIGMOD Record, 30, 15, 10.1145/604264.604268 · DOI
  15. 10.1504/IJSN.2010.032218 · doi:10.1504/ijsn.2010.032218
  16. fragkiadakis, 2012, A Survey on Security Threats and Detection Techniques in Cognitive Radio Networks, IEEE Commun Surveys Tutorials, pp, 1
  17. 10.1016/j.comcom.2004.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1109/TSP.2003.814797 · DOI · Paper page
  19. ertoz, 2004, Data Mining[mdash]Next Generation Challenges and Future Directions
  20. 10.1007/s10710-010-9101-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/ICDM.2006.165 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/S0167-8655(03)00004-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.06.014 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.comnet.2008.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
  25. rehak, 2008, CAMNEP: Agent-based Network Intrusion Detection System, Proc 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems Industrial Track, 133
  26. 10.3923/itj.2012.1243.1250 · doi:10.3923/itj.2012.1243.1250
  27. zhi-dong, 2011, Decision-level fusion model of multi-source intrusion detection alerts, J Communications, 32, 121
  28. 10.1109/TIFS.2008.928539 · DOI
  29. shifflet, 2005, A Technique Independent Fusion Model For Network Intrusion Detection, Proceedings of the Midstates Conference on Undergraduate Research in Computer Science and Mathematics, 3, 13
  30. 10.1109/SURV.2010.032810.00007 · doi:10.1109/surv.2010.032810.00007
  31. 10.1109/SURV.2009.090208 · doi:10.1109/surv.2009.090208
  32. breiman, 1984, Classification and Regression Trees
  33. 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.06.019 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1109/CNMT.2009.5374676 · DOI
  35. 10.1109/TVT.2006.874579 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2006.874579
  36. 10.1109/SURV.2010.032210.00054 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1109/TVT.2007.901875 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2007.901875
  38. 10.1109/MWC.2007.4396943 · doi:10.1109/mwc.2007.4396943
  39. 10.1145/1216370.1216373 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1002/dac.853 · DOI
  41. 10.1504/IJKESDP.2009.021985 · doi:10.1504/ijkesdp.2009.021985
  42. 10.1137/1.9781611972788.22 · DOI · Paper page
  43. gao, 2005, Ant colony optimization based network intrusion feature selection and detection, Proc International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 6, 3871
  44. 10.1109/3477.484436 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1007/978-1-4615-0953-0_1 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.asoc.2010.12.011 · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2010.12.011
  47. 10.1109/ICHIT.2006.253508 · DOI
  48. 10.1109/ACIIDS.2009.59 · doi:10.1109/aciids.2009.59
  49. adetunmbi, 2008, Network Intrusion Detection based on Rough Set and k-Nearest Neighbour, International Journal of Computing and ICT Research, 2, 60
  50. xian, 2005, A novel intrusion detection method based on clonal selection clustering algorithm, Proc International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 6
  51. 10.1109/ICECS.2003.1302048 · doi:10.1109/icecs.2003.1302048
  52. 10.1007/BF01001956 · DOI · Paper page
  53. cai, 2003, A rough set theory based method for anomaly intrusion detection in computer network systems, Expert Systems, 20, 251, 10.1111/1468-0394.00249 · doi:10.1111/1468-0394.00249
  54. 10.1016/S1088-467X(97)00008-5 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1145/2076623.2076647 · doi:10.1145/2076623.2076647
  56. portnoy, 2001, Intrusion detection with unlabeled data using clustering, Proc ACM CSS Workshop on Data Mining Applied to Security
  57. 10.1145/1081870.1081917 · DOI · Paper page
  58. theiler, 2003, Resampling approach for anomaly detection in multispectral images, Proc SPIE, 5093, 230, 10.1117/12.487069 · DOI
  59. 10.1145/375663.375673 · DOI
  60. hsu, 2005, An integrated framework for visualized and exploratory pattern discovery in mixed data, IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 18, 161
  61. 10.1137/1.9780898718348 · DOI · Paper page
  62. ghorbani, 2009, Network Intrusion Detection and Prevention Concepts and Techniques
  63. 10.1504/IJSN.2008.016199 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/0020-7101(95)01136-3 · DOI
  65. 10.1007/11941439_127 · doi:10.1007/11941439_127
  66. schapire, 1999, A brief introduction to boosting, Proceedings of the Joint International Conference for Artificial Intelligence, 1401
  67. 10.1109/INFCOM.2009.5061947 · DOI
  68. anderson, 1995, Detecting unusual program behaviour using the statistical component of the next-generation intrusion detection expert system (NIDES), Tech Rep SRIO-CSL-95-06
  69. denning, 1985, Requirements and model for IDES a real-time intrusion detection system, Tech Rep 83F 83-01-00
  70. 10.1109/32.372146 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1504/IJSN.2011.043674 · doi:10.1504/ijsn.2011.043674
  72. 10.1145/1541880.1541882 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1016/j.comnet.2007.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  74. edgeworth, 1887, On discordant observations, Philosophy Mag, 23, 364
  75. 10.1023/B:AIRE.0000045502.10941.a9 · doi:10.1023/b:aire.0000045502.10941.a9 · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/j.cose.2008.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  77. choi, 2010, A Survey of Binary Similarity and Distance Measures, J Systemics Cybernetics and Informatics, 8, 43
  78. 10.1145/586143.586146 · DOI
  79. 10.1109/SURV.2008.080406 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.10.003 · DOI
  81. tan, 2005, Introduction to Data Mining
  82. 10.1109/MDSO.2005.53 · DOI
  83. cha, 2007, Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions, Math Models Methods Appl Sci, 1, 300
  84. 10.1504/IJKESDP.2009.021985 · doi:10.1504/ijkesdp.2009.021985
  85. ning, 2003, Intrusion Detection
  86. 10.1109/NOMS.2008.4575130 · doi:10.1109/noms.2008.4575130
  87. 10.1093/comjnl/bxr035 · DOI
  88. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x · DOI · Paper page
  89. goodman, 1954, Measures of associations for cross-validations, J American Statistics Association, 49, 732
  90. 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000533 · DOI
  92. 10.1080/01969727308546047 · DOI
  93. 10.1109/34.85677 · DOI · Paper page
  94. 10.2307/2284239 · DOI
  95. 10.1007/BF02339490 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1080/00401706.1960.10489888 · DOI · Paper page
  97. eskin, 2000, Anomaly detection over noisy data using learned probability distributions, Proc 7th Int Conf Machine Learning, 255
  98. chen, 2006, Survey and taxonomy of feature selection algorithms in intrusion detection system, 2nd SKLOIS Conference on Information Security and Cryptology, 153, 10.1007/11937807_13 · doi:10.1007/11937807_13
  99. 10.1109/ICPR.2010.378 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2010.378
  100. 10.1016/j.cose.2009.01.001 · DOI
  101. 10.1109/SAINT.2003.1183050 · DOI · Paper page
  102. 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159 · DOI · Paper page
  103. 10.1016/j.jnca.2011.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  104. 10.1080/01969727408546059 · DOI · Paper page
  105. 10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909 · DOI · Paper page
  106. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1976.tb00714.x · DOI · Paper page
  107. 10.1080/01621459.1975.10480256 · DOI · Paper page
  108. 10.1016/j.future.2010.12.017 · DOI
  109. locasto, 2005, FLIPS: Hybrid Adaptive Intrusion Prevention, Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection, 82
  110. 10.1016/j.jnca.2005.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
  111. arumugam, 2010, Implementation of two class classifiers for hybrid intrusion detection, International Conference on Communication and Computational Intelligence, 486
  112. 10.1109/ARES.2006.7 · DOI
  113. 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2008.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
  114. 10.1002/sec.592 · DOI
  115. 10.1007/11427469_77 · doi:10.1007/11427469_77
  116. 10.1109/ICNSC.2006.1673246 · doi:10.1109/icnsc.2006.1673246
  117. 10.1109/ICNS.2007.49 · DOI
  118. subramoniam, 2005, Development of a Comprehensive Intrusion Detection System - Challenges and Approaches, Proc of the International Conference on Information Systems Security, 332, 10.1007/11593980_27 · doi:10.1007/11593980_27
  119. 10.1109/CSO.2010.62 · doi:10.1109/cso.2010.62
  120. agrawal, 1994, Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases, Proc the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 487
  121. 10.1016/j.cose.2010.12.004 · DOI
  122. 10.1109/CSAC.2003.1254306 · DOI · Paper page
  123. 10.1007/978-3-642-04843-2_32 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04843-2_32
  124. 10.1109/ICCSN.2010.104 · DOI
  125. 10.1109/TKDE.2007.44 · DOI
  126. 10.1145/1401890.1401915 · DOI
  127. chan, 2003, A machine learning approach to anomaly detection, Tech Rep CS-2003-06
  128. 10.1109/MCOM.2002.1039860 · DOI · Paper page
  129. wang, 2004, Anomalous Payload-Based Network Intrusion Detection, Proc Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection, 203, 10.1007/978-3-540-30143-1_11 · DOI · Paper page
  130. 10.1109/ICDM.2003.1250987 · DOI
  131. 10.1243/0954406981521448 · DOI
  132. yu, 2012, A Nonparametric Adaptive CUSUM Method And Its Application In Network Anomaly Detection, International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, 4, 280, 10.4156/ijact.vol4.issue1.32 · doi:10.4156/ijact.vol4.issue1.32
  133. 10.1109/TKDE.2007.1009 · DOI · Paper page
  134. 10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.232 · doi:10.1109/infocom.2008.232
  135. 10.1155/2009/837601 · DOI · Paper page
  136. 10.1109/TDSC.2011.14 · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2011.14
  137. 10.1109/TSMCC.2008.923876 · DOI · Paper page
  138. 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.029 · DOI · Paper page
  139. 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.033 · DOI
  140. selim, 2011, Hybrid Multi-level Intrusion Detection System, International Journal of Information and Computer Security, 9, 23
  141. 10.1145/1330107.1330147 · DOI · Paper page
  142. 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.004 · DOI
  143. yu, 2010, A New Model of Intelligent Hybrid Network Intrusion Detection System, International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Technology, 386
  144. 10.1109/CISDA.2009.5356528 · DOI · Paper page
  145. 2009, NSL-KDD data set for network-based intrusion detection systems
  146. 10.1109/DISCEX.2000.821515 · DOI · Paper page
  147. 10.1016/j.cose.2011.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
  148. 10.1007/978-3-642-32129-0_34 · DOI
  149. bhuyan, 2012, AOCD: An Adaptive Outlier Based Coordinated Scan Detection Approach, International J Network Security, 14, 339
  150. mahoney, 2003, An Analysis of the 1999 DARPAILincoin Laboratory Evaluation Data for Network Anomaly Detection, Proc Int l Symp Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection, 220, 10.1007/978-3-540-45248-5_13 · DOI · Paper page
  151. 10.1145/382912.382923 · DOI · Paper page
  152. xu, 2010, Intrusion Detection using Continuous Time Bayesian Networks, J Artificial Intelligence Research, 39, 745, 10.1613/jair.3050 · DOI
  153. mell, 2003, An Overview of Issues in Testing Intrusion Detection Systems, 10.6028/NIST.IR.7007 · DOI · Paper page
  154. weiss, 2003, The Handbook of Data Mining, 426
  155. wang, 2008, Statistical Techniques for Network Security Modern Statistically-Based Intrusion Detection and Protection
  156. dokas, 2002, Data Mining for Network Intrusion Detection, Proc NSF Workshop on next Generation Data Mining
  157. 10.1145/775047.775092 · DOI
  158. lippmann, 2000, Evaluating Intrusion Detection Systems: The 1998 DARPA Offline Intrusion Detection Evaluation, Proc DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition, 12
  159. 10.1145/357830.357849 · DOI · Paper page
  160. 10.1016/S0140-3664(00)00364-9 · DOI
  161. 10.1109/ICC.2008.304 · doi:10.1109/icc.2008.304
  162. 10.1145/1947940.1948050 · DOI
  163. havkin, 1999, Neural Networks
  164. 10.5120/2303-2914 · DOI
  165. 10.1016/j.cose.2006.05.003 · DOI
  166. cannady, 2000, Applying CMAC-Based On-Line Learning to Intrusion Detection, Proc IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 5, 405, 10.1109/IJCNN.2000.861503 · DOI
  167. 10.1109/3468.935046 · DOI · Paper page
  168. carpenter, 2010, Adaptive resonance theory, CAS/CNS Technical Report Series no 008
  169. 10.1109/5.58325 · DOI · Paper page
  170. maxion, 2004, Proper Use of ROC Curves in Intrusion/Anomaly Detection, Tech Report CS-TR
  171. 10.1145/319709.319712 · DOI
  172. 10.1109/WKDD.2009.214 · doi:10.1109/wkdd.2009.214
  173. 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.10.146 · DOI
  174. 10.1109/72.279189 · doi:10.1109/72.279189
  175. 10.1109/ICIII.2010.578 · doi:10.1109/iciii.2010.578
  176. labib, 2002, NSOM: A Tool To Detect Denial Of Service Attacks Using Self-Organizing Maps, Tech Rep
  177. 10.1109/IWIA.2006.18 · doi:10.1109/iwia.2006.18
  178. mahoney, 2001, PHAD: Packet Header Anomaly Detection for Identifying Hostile Network Traffic, Tech Tech Rep cs-2001-04
  179. 10.1109/NAFIPS.2000.877441 · DOI
  180. geramiraz, 2012, Adaptive Anomaly-Based Intrusion Detection System Using Fuzzy Controller, International Journal of Network Security, 14, 352
  181. anderson, 1980, Computer Security Threat Monitoring and Surveillance, Tech Rep
  182. 10.1016/j.asoc.2008.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  183. 10.1145/332159.332161 · DOI · Paper page
  184. 10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2050685 · DOI
  185. yu, 2003, Handbook of Natural Computing
  186. 10.3923/itj.2011.648.655 · DOI
  187. 10.1007/s00778-006-0002-5 · DOI · Paper page
  188. 10.1016/j.cose.2008.12.001 · DOI
  189. 10.1007/978-3-642-20757-0_3 · DOI
  190. 10.1504/IJSN.2010.037661 · doi:10.1504/ijsn.2010.037661
  191. 10.1007/978-3-642-17881-8_8 · DOI
  192. 10.1023/A:1006624031083 · DOI · Paper page
  193. 10.1145/956804.956828 · doi:10.1145/956804.956828
  194. rousseeuw, 1987, Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, 10.1002/0471725382 · DOI · Paper page
  195. barnett, 1994, Outliers in Statistical Data
  196. beckman, 1983, Outliers, Technometrics, 25, 119
  197. 10.1016/j.comcom.2012.01.016 · DOI · Paper page
  198. 10.1109/ICCIS.2006.252287 · DOI
  199. 10.1109/WGEC.2009.72 · DOI
  200. 10.1093/comjnl/bxr026 · DOI · Paper page

200 of 209 shown

Cited by

See all 1,348

Metadata

Authors
Bhuyan, M. H., Bhattacharyya, D. K., & Kalita, J. K.
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Published
2014
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
303-336
ISSN
1553-877X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966809779
Cited by
1,348
References
9
FWCI
66.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network Anomaly Detection: Methods, Systems and Tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00046
The paper
Bhuyan, M. H., Bhattacharyya, D. K., & Kalita, J. K. (2014). Network Anomaly Detection: Methods, Systems and Tools. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.