The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network Anomaly Detection: Methods, Systems and Tools
Abstract
Network anomaly detection is an important and dynamic research area. Many network intrusion detection methods and systems (NIDS) have been proposed in the literature. In this paper, we provide a structured and comprehensive overview of various facets of network anomaly detection so that a researcher can become quickly familiar with every aspect of network anomaly detection. We present attacks normally encountered by network intrusion detection systems. We categorize existing network anomaly detection methods and systems based on the underlying computational techniques used. Within this framework, we briefly describe and compare a large number of network anomaly detection methods and systems. In addition, we also discuss tools that can be used by network defenders and datasets that researchers in network anomaly detection can use. We also highlight research directions in network anomaly detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution
Schölkopf, B., Platt, J. C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Smola, A. J., & Williamson, R. C. (2001) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976601750264965 · Cited by 6,168
Friedman, N., Geiger, D., & Goldszmidt, M. (1997) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007465528199 · Cited by 4,742
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
Rokach, L. (2010) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-009-9124-7 · Cited by 2,657
Robust classification for imprecise environments
Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007601015854 · Cited by 1,250
Toward Credible Evaluation of Anomaly-Based Intrusion-Detection Methods
Tavallaee, M., Stakhanova, N., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2048428 · Cited by 280
A clustering-based method for unsupervised intrusion detections
Jiang, S., Song, X., Wang, H., Han, J.-J., & Li, Q.-H. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.11.007 · Cited by 164
A comprehensive survey of numeric and symbolic outlier mining techniques
Agyemang, M., Barker, K., & Alhajj, R. (2006) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.3233/ida-2006-10604 · Cited by 164
Research works printed but not linked: 209
- 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.046 · DOI
- 10.1109/MCAS.2006.1688199 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.csi.2007.07.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.inffus.2006.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-540-76929-3_24 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICDM.2010.140 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cose.2004.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ISCC.2010.5546735 · DOI
- naldurg, 2004, A Temporal Logic Based Framework for Intrusion Detection, Proc IFIP WG 6 1 Int Conf Formal Techn Netw Distrib Syst, 359
- 10.1109/IWIAS.2003.1192454 · DOI
- kayacik, 2005, Selecting Features for Intrusion Detection: A Feature Relevance Analysis on KDD 99 Intrusion Detection Datasets, Proc 3rd Annual Conf Privacy Security Trust
- heady, 1990, The Architecture of a Network Level Intrusion Detection System, Tech Rep TR-90
- zhang, 2001, HIDE: a Hierarchical Network Intrusion Detection System Using Statistical Preprocessing and Neural Network Classification, IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Information Assurance Workshop
- daniel, 2001, ADAM: a testbed for exploring the use of data mining in intrusion detection, ACM SIGMOD Record, 30, 15, 10.1145/604264.604268 · DOI
- 10.1504/IJSN.2010.032218 · doi:10.1504/ijsn.2010.032218
- fragkiadakis, 2012, A Survey on Security Threats and Detection Techniques in Cognitive Radio Networks, IEEE Commun Surveys Tutorials, pp, 1
- 10.1016/j.comcom.2004.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSP.2003.814797 · DOI · Paper page
- ertoz, 2004, Data Mining[mdash]Next Generation Challenges and Future Directions
- 10.1007/s10710-010-9101-6 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICDM.2006.165 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0167-8655(03)00004-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.06.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.comnet.2008.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
- rehak, 2008, CAMNEP: Agent-based Network Intrusion Detection System, Proc 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems Industrial Track, 133
- 10.3923/itj.2012.1243.1250 · doi:10.3923/itj.2012.1243.1250
- zhi-dong, 2011, Decision-level fusion model of multi-source intrusion detection alerts, J Communications, 32, 121
- 10.1109/TIFS.2008.928539 · DOI
- shifflet, 2005, A Technique Independent Fusion Model For Network Intrusion Detection, Proceedings of the Midstates Conference on Undergraduate Research in Computer Science and Mathematics, 3, 13
- 10.1109/SURV.2010.032810.00007 · doi:10.1109/surv.2010.032810.00007
- 10.1109/SURV.2009.090208 · doi:10.1109/surv.2009.090208
- breiman, 1984, Classification and Regression Trees
- 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.06.019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CNMT.2009.5374676 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVT.2006.874579 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2006.874579
- 10.1109/SURV.2010.032210.00054 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TVT.2007.901875 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2007.901875
- 10.1109/MWC.2007.4396943 · doi:10.1109/mwc.2007.4396943
- 10.1145/1216370.1216373 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/dac.853 · DOI
- 10.1504/IJKESDP.2009.021985 · doi:10.1504/ijkesdp.2009.021985
- 10.1137/1.9781611972788.22 · DOI · Paper page
- gao, 2005, Ant colony optimization based network intrusion feature selection and detection, Proc International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 6, 3871
- 10.1109/3477.484436 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-0953-0_1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.asoc.2010.12.011 · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2010.12.011
- 10.1109/ICHIT.2006.253508 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACIIDS.2009.59 · doi:10.1109/aciids.2009.59
- adetunmbi, 2008, Network Intrusion Detection based on Rough Set and k-Nearest Neighbour, International Journal of Computing and ICT Research, 2, 60
- xian, 2005, A novel intrusion detection method based on clonal selection clustering algorithm, Proc International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 6
- 10.1109/ICECS.2003.1302048 · doi:10.1109/icecs.2003.1302048
- 10.1007/BF01001956 · DOI · Paper page
- cai, 2003, A rough set theory based method for anomaly intrusion detection in computer network systems, Expert Systems, 20, 251, 10.1111/1468-0394.00249 · doi:10.1111/1468-0394.00249
- 10.1016/S1088-467X(97)00008-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2076623.2076647 · doi:10.1145/2076623.2076647
- portnoy, 2001, Intrusion detection with unlabeled data using clustering, Proc ACM CSS Workshop on Data Mining Applied to Security
- 10.1145/1081870.1081917 · DOI · Paper page
- theiler, 2003, Resampling approach for anomaly detection in multispectral images, Proc SPIE, 5093, 230, 10.1117/12.487069 · DOI
- 10.1145/375663.375673 · DOI
- hsu, 2005, An integrated framework for visualized and exploratory pattern discovery in mixed data, IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 18, 161
- 10.1137/1.9780898718348 · DOI · Paper page
- ghorbani, 2009, Network Intrusion Detection and Prevention Concepts and Techniques
- 10.1504/IJSN.2008.016199 · DOI
- 10.1016/0020-7101(95)01136-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/11941439_127 · doi:10.1007/11941439_127
- schapire, 1999, A brief introduction to boosting, Proceedings of the Joint International Conference for Artificial Intelligence, 1401
- 10.1109/INFCOM.2009.5061947 · DOI
- anderson, 1995, Detecting unusual program behaviour using the statistical component of the next-generation intrusion detection expert system (NIDES), Tech Rep SRIO-CSL-95-06
- denning, 1985, Requirements and model for IDES a real-time intrusion detection system, Tech Rep 83F 83-01-00
- 10.1109/32.372146 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1504/IJSN.2011.043674 · doi:10.1504/ijsn.2011.043674
- 10.1145/1541880.1541882 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.comnet.2007.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
- edgeworth, 1887, On discordant observations, Philosophy Mag, 23, 364
- 10.1023/B:AIRE.0000045502.10941.a9 · doi:10.1023/b:aire.0000045502.10941.a9 · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cose.2008.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
- choi, 2010, A Survey of Binary Similarity and Distance Measures, J Systemics Cybernetics and Informatics, 8, 43
- 10.1145/586143.586146 · DOI
- 10.1109/SURV.2008.080406 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.10.003 · DOI
- tan, 2005, Introduction to Data Mining
- 10.1109/MDSO.2005.53 · DOI
- cha, 2007, Comprehensive Survey on Distance/Similarity Measures between Probability Density Functions, Math Models Methods Appl Sci, 1, 300
- 10.1504/IJKESDP.2009.021985 · doi:10.1504/ijkesdp.2009.021985
- ning, 2003, Intrusion Detection
- 10.1109/NOMS.2008.4575130 · doi:10.1109/noms.2008.4575130
- 10.1093/comjnl/bxr035 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x · DOI · Paper page
- goodman, 1954, Measures of associations for cross-validations, J American Statistics Association, 49, 732
- 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000533 · DOI
- 10.1080/01969727308546047 · DOI
- 10.1109/34.85677 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2284239 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02339490 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00401706.1960.10489888 · DOI · Paper page
- eskin, 2000, Anomaly detection over noisy data using learned probability distributions, Proc 7th Int Conf Machine Learning, 255
- chen, 2006, Survey and taxonomy of feature selection algorithms in intrusion detection system, 2nd SKLOIS Conference on Information Security and Cryptology, 153, 10.1007/11937807_13 · doi:10.1007/11937807_13
- 10.1109/ICPR.2010.378 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2010.378
- 10.1016/j.cose.2009.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1109/SAINT.2003.1183050 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jnca.2011.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01969727408546059 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1976.tb00714.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01621459.1975.10480256 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.future.2010.12.017 · DOI
- locasto, 2005, FLIPS: Hybrid Adaptive Intrusion Prevention, Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection, 82
- 10.1016/j.jnca.2005.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
- arumugam, 2010, Implementation of two class classifiers for hybrid intrusion detection, International Conference on Communication and Computational Intelligence, 486
- 10.1109/ARES.2006.7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2008.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/sec.592 · DOI
- 10.1007/11427469_77 · doi:10.1007/11427469_77
- 10.1109/ICNSC.2006.1673246 · doi:10.1109/icnsc.2006.1673246
- 10.1109/ICNS.2007.49 · DOI
- subramoniam, 2005, Development of a Comprehensive Intrusion Detection System - Challenges and Approaches, Proc of the International Conference on Information Systems Security, 332, 10.1007/11593980_27 · doi:10.1007/11593980_27
- 10.1109/CSO.2010.62 · doi:10.1109/cso.2010.62
- agrawal, 1994, Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases, Proc the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 487
- 10.1016/j.cose.2010.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1109/CSAC.2003.1254306 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-642-04843-2_32 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04843-2_32
- 10.1109/ICCSN.2010.104 · DOI
- 10.1109/TKDE.2007.44 · DOI
- 10.1145/1401890.1401915 · DOI
- chan, 2003, A machine learning approach to anomaly detection, Tech Rep CS-2003-06
- 10.1109/MCOM.2002.1039860 · DOI · Paper page
- wang, 2004, Anomalous Payload-Based Network Intrusion Detection, Proc Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection, 203, 10.1007/978-3-540-30143-1_11 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICDM.2003.1250987 · DOI
- 10.1243/0954406981521448 · DOI
- yu, 2012, A Nonparametric Adaptive CUSUM Method And Its Application In Network Anomaly Detection, International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, 4, 280, 10.4156/ijact.vol4.issue1.32 · doi:10.4156/ijact.vol4.issue1.32
- 10.1109/TKDE.2007.1009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.232 · doi:10.1109/infocom.2008.232
- 10.1155/2009/837601 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TDSC.2011.14 · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2011.14
- 10.1109/TSMCC.2008.923876 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.033 · DOI
- selim, 2011, Hybrid Multi-level Intrusion Detection System, International Journal of Information and Computer Security, 9, 23
- 10.1145/1330107.1330147 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.004 · DOI
- yu, 2010, A New Model of Intelligent Hybrid Network Intrusion Detection System, International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Technology, 386
- 10.1109/CISDA.2009.5356528 · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, NSL-KDD data set for network-based intrusion detection systems
- 10.1109/DISCEX.2000.821515 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cose.2011.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-642-32129-0_34 · DOI
- bhuyan, 2012, AOCD: An Adaptive Outlier Based Coordinated Scan Detection Approach, International J Network Security, 14, 339
- mahoney, 2003, An Analysis of the 1999 DARPAILincoin Laboratory Evaluation Data for Network Anomaly Detection, Proc Int l Symp Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection, 220, 10.1007/978-3-540-45248-5_13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/382912.382923 · DOI · Paper page
- xu, 2010, Intrusion Detection using Continuous Time Bayesian Networks, J Artificial Intelligence Research, 39, 745, 10.1613/jair.3050 · DOI
- mell, 2003, An Overview of Issues in Testing Intrusion Detection Systems, 10.6028/NIST.IR.7007 · DOI · Paper page
- weiss, 2003, The Handbook of Data Mining, 426
- wang, 2008, Statistical Techniques for Network Security Modern Statistically-Based Intrusion Detection and Protection
- dokas, 2002, Data Mining for Network Intrusion Detection, Proc NSF Workshop on next Generation Data Mining
- 10.1145/775047.775092 · DOI
- lippmann, 2000, Evaluating Intrusion Detection Systems: The 1998 DARPA Offline Intrusion Detection Evaluation, Proc DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition, 12
- 10.1145/357830.357849 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-3664(00)00364-9 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICC.2008.304 · doi:10.1109/icc.2008.304
- 10.1145/1947940.1948050 · DOI
- havkin, 1999, Neural Networks
- 10.5120/2303-2914 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cose.2006.05.003 · DOI
- cannady, 2000, Applying CMAC-Based On-Line Learning to Intrusion Detection, Proc IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 5, 405, 10.1109/IJCNN.2000.861503 · DOI
- 10.1109/3468.935046 · DOI · Paper page
- carpenter, 2010, Adaptive resonance theory, CAS/CNS Technical Report Series no 008
- 10.1109/5.58325 · DOI · Paper page
- maxion, 2004, Proper Use of ROC Curves in Intrusion/Anomaly Detection, Tech Report CS-TR
- 10.1145/319709.319712 · DOI
- 10.1109/WKDD.2009.214 · doi:10.1109/wkdd.2009.214
- 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.10.146 · DOI
- 10.1109/72.279189 · doi:10.1109/72.279189
- 10.1109/ICIII.2010.578 · doi:10.1109/iciii.2010.578
- labib, 2002, NSOM: A Tool To Detect Denial Of Service Attacks Using Self-Organizing Maps, Tech Rep
- 10.1109/IWIA.2006.18 · doi:10.1109/iwia.2006.18
- mahoney, 2001, PHAD: Packet Header Anomaly Detection for Identifying Hostile Network Traffic, Tech Tech Rep cs-2001-04
- 10.1109/NAFIPS.2000.877441 · DOI
- geramiraz, 2012, Adaptive Anomaly-Based Intrusion Detection System Using Fuzzy Controller, International Journal of Network Security, 14, 352
- anderson, 1980, Computer Security Threat Monitoring and Surveillance, Tech Rep
- 10.1016/j.asoc.2008.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/332159.332161 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2050685 · DOI
- yu, 2003, Handbook of Natural Computing
- 10.3923/itj.2011.648.655 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00778-006-0002-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cose.2008.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-20757-0_3 · DOI
- 10.1504/IJSN.2010.037661 · doi:10.1504/ijsn.2010.037661
- 10.1007/978-3-642-17881-8_8 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1006624031083 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/956804.956828 · doi:10.1145/956804.956828
- rousseeuw, 1987, Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, 10.1002/0471725382 · DOI · Paper page
- barnett, 1994, Outliers in Statistical Data
- beckman, 1983, Outliers, Technometrics, 25, 119
- 10.1016/j.comcom.2012.01.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICCIS.2006.252287 · DOI
- 10.1109/WGEC.2009.72 · DOI
- 10.1093/comjnl/bxr026 · DOI · Paper page
200 of 209 shown
Cited by
A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection
Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2494502 · Cited by 3,332
Survey of intrusion detection systems: Techniques, datasets and challenges
Khraisat, A., Gondal, I., Vamplew, P., & Kamruzzaman, J. (2019) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-019-0038-7 · Cited by 2,024
A Survey of Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Internet of Things (IoT) Security
Al-Garadi, M. A., Mohamed, A., Al-Ali, A. K., Du, X., Ali, I., & Guizani, M. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2988293 · Cited by 1,392
Malware traffic classification using convolutional neural network for representation learning
Wang, W., Zhu, M., Zeng, X., Ye, X., & Sheng, Y. (2017) · 2017 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN) · doi:10.1109/icoin.2017.7899588 · Cited by 1,177
Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review
Nassif, A. B., Talib, M. A., Nasir, Q., & Dakalbab, F. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3083060 · Cited by 748
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhuyan, M. H., Bhattacharyya, D. K., & Kalita, J. K.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 303-336
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966809779
- Cited by
- 1,348
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 66.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network Anomaly Detection: Methods, Systems and Tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00046
- The paper
- Bhuyan, M. H., Bhattacharyya, D. K., & Kalita, J. K. (2014). Network Anomaly Detection: Methods, Systems and Tools. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.