Cited by 1Network Security and Intrusion DetectionInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Lightweight Identification of Malicious IoT Traffic via Cross-View Knowledge Distillation

Nie, Fengyuan, Liu, Weiwei, Liu, Guangjie, Gao, Bo, Huang, Jianan, Yuen, Chau·2025·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

Accurately identifying malicious traffic in heterogeneous IoT environments is critical for network security. Although deep learning-based methods can effectively extract multi-dimensional features and achieve high accuracy, deploying complex models on resource-constrained IoT devices remains challenging. To balance performance and efficiency, we propose IoT-CVKD, a novel malicious IoT traffic identification framework leveraging cross-view knowledge distillation. IoT-CVKD consists of a multi-view teacher model and a lightweight single-view student model. The teacher model characterizes heterogeneous traffic from different perspectives by capturing flow-level global and packet-level spatio-temporal local burst information, and efficiently fuses these features using a cross-attention mechanism. The student model, composed of lightweight and computationally efficient modules, takes only packet-level features as input. Multi-view knowledge from the teacher is then implicitly distilled into the student through cross-view knowledge distillation during training, thereby significantly enhancing the student’s classification capability. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that IoT-CVKD achieves superior classification performance compared to state-of-the-art methods while substantially reducing computational complexity, making it highly suitable for resource-constrained IoT deployments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2025.3596167

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Nie, F., Liu, W., Liu, G., Gao, B., Huang, J., & Yuen, C.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2025-10-15
Volume
12
Issue
20
Pages
42337-42351
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W4412984935
Cited by
1
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021QY0700)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21B2003, 62072250, 61602247)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
lightweight student models, cross-attention fusion, resource-constrained IoT devices, IoT network security, network traffic classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review