Cited by 75Digital Transformation in IndustryEngineering Technology and MethodologiesFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems

MTComm Based Virtualization and Integration of Physical Machine Operations with Digital-Twins in Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Cloud

Open access
Shahriar, Md Rakib, Sunny, S M Nahian Al, Liu, Xiaoqing, Leu, Ming C., Hu, Liwen, Nguyen, Ngoc-Tu·2018·2018 5th IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud)/2018 4th IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing and Scalable Cloud (EdgeCom)

Abstract

Digital-Twins simulate physical world objects by creating 'as-is' virtual images in a cyberspace. In order to create a well synchronized digital-twin simulator in manufacturing, information and activities of a physical machine need to be virtualized. Many existing digital-twins stream read-only data of machine sensors and do not incorporate operations of manufacturing machines through Internet. In this paper, a new method of virtualization is proposed to integrate machining data and operations into the digital-twins using Internet scale machine tool communication method. A fully functional digital-twin is implemented in CPMC testbed using MTComm and several manufacturing application scenarios are developed to evaluate the proposed method and system. Performance analysis shows that it is capable of providing data-driven visual monitoring of a manufacturing process and performing manufacturing operations through digital twins over the Internet. Results of the experiments also shows that the MTComm based digital twins have an excellent efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cscloud/edgecom.2018.00018

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the reviewed articles, DT was considered helpful for safety reasons in human-robot interaction, monitoring of smart wearable equipment, manufacturing of a produced part, VR visualization platform creation, and HMI visualization environments.

    “- 6) DT was also considered helpful for 'Safety reasons' in human-robot interaction [61,63,64], in monitoring of a smart wearable equipment [67], or in the manufacturing process of a produced part [66], within a virtual reality (VR) visualization platform creation [65] or with a HMI visualization environment [60].”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [63]

  • Two reviewed articles use a prediction model.

    “In two cases is used a prediction model [25,63]”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [63]

  • In four reviewed articles, the dataset description is done using Unified Modeling Language (UML).

    “in four cases a description is done using Unified Modeling Language (UML) [25,51,63,73]”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [63]

  • The dataset description is explicitly mentioned in only nineteen reviewed articles.

    “The dataset description is showed only in nineteen articles: in four cases a description is done using Unified Modeling Language (UML) [25,51,63,73], in one case only with the Sequence Diagram (SD) [75].”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [63]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shahriar, M. R., Sunny, S. M. N. A., Liu, X., Leu, M. C., Hu, L., & Nguyen, N.-T.
Affiliations
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
  • Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
Venue
2018 5th IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud)/2018 4th IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing and Scalable Cloud (EdgeCom)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
46-51
OpenAlex
W2885616781
Cited by
75
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI
12.60
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nd
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing / IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing and Scalable Cloud (CSCloud/EdgeCom) (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Engineering Technology and Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
Keywords
digital twin, machining data, visual monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review