The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic tracking in joint feature-spatial spaces
Abstract
In this paper, we present a probabilistic framework for tracking regions based on their appearance. We exploit the feature-spatial distribution of a region representing an object as a probabilistic constraint to track that region over time. The tracking is achieved by maximizing a similarity-based objective function over transformation space given a nonparametric representation of the joint feature-spatial distribution. Such a representation imposes a probabilistic constraint on the region feature distribution coupled with the region structure, which yields an appearance tracker that is robust to small local deformations and partial occlusion. We present the approach for the general form of joint feature-spatial distributions and apply it to tracking with different types of image features including row intensity, color and image gradient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient region tracking with parametric models of geometry and illumination
Hager, G. D., & Belhumeur, P. N. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.722606 · Cited by 1,066
Cited by
Real-Time Tracking via On-line Boosting
Grabner, H., Grabner, M., & Bischof, H. (2006) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2006 · doi:10.5244/c.20.6 · Cited by 1,198
Online selection of discriminative tracking features
Collins, R. T., Liu, Y., & Leordeanu, M. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.205 · Cited by 1,208
Deep Metric Learning: A Survey
KAYA, M., & BİLGE, H. Ş. (2019) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym11091066 · Cited by 703
Metadata
- Authors
- Elgammal, A., Duraiswami, R., & Davis, L. S.
- Venue
- 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings.
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2003-11-04
- Pages
- I-781-I-788
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117239879
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
