Cited by 126Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisFace and Expression Recognition

Dynamics of Facial Expression Extracted Automatically from Video

Littlewort, G., Bartlett, M.S., Fasel, I., Susskind, J., Movellan, J.·2005·2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop

Abstract

We present a systematic comparison of machine learning methods applied to the problem of fully automatic recognition of facial expressions, including AdaBoost, support vector machines, and linear discriminant analysis. Each video-frame is first scanned in real-time to detect approximately upright-frontal faces. The faces found are scaled into image patches of equal size, convolved with a bank of Gabor energy filters, and then passed to a recognition engine that codes facial expressions into 7 dimensions in real time: neutral, anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, surprise. We report results on a series of experiments comparing spatial frequency ranges, feature selection techniques, and recognition engines. Best results were obtained by selecting a subset of Gabor filters using AdaBoost and then training Support Vector Machines on the outputs of the filters selected by AdaBoost. The generalization performance to new subjects for a 7-way forced choice was 93% or more correct on two publicly available datasets, the best performance reported so far on these datasets. Surprisingly, registration of internal facial features was not necessary, even though the face detector does not provide precisely registered images. The outputs of the classifier change smoothly as a function of time and thus can be used for unobtrusive motion capture. We developed an end-to-end system that provides facial expression codes at 24 frames per second and animates a computer generated character. In real-time this expression mirror operates down to resolutions of 16 pixels from eye to eye. We also applied the system to fully automated facial action coding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2004.327

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Littlewort, G., Bartlett, M. S., Fasel, I., Susskind, J., & Movellan, J.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2005-04-05
Pages
80-80
OpenAlex
W2134393319
Cited by
126
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial expression recognition, Gabor filters, AdaBoost, support vector machine, linear discriminant analysis, face detection, feature selection, facial action coding, real-time video processing, emotion recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review