Cited by 473D Shape Modeling and AnalysisMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesTopological and Geometric Data Analysis

Groupwise point pattern registration using a novel CDF-based Jensen-Shannon Divergence

Open access
Fei Wang, Vemuri, B.C., Rangarajan, A.·2006·2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel and robust algorithm for the groupwise non-rigid registration of multiple unlabeled point-sets with no bias toward any of the given point-sets. To quantify the divergence between multiple probability distributions each estimated from the given point sets, we develop a novel measure based on their cumulative distribution functions that we dub the CDF-JS divergence. The measure parallels the well known Jensen-Shannon divergence (defined for probability density functions) but is more regular than the JS divergence since its definition is based on CDFs as opposed to density functions. As a consequence, CDF-JS is more immune to noise and statistically more robust than the JS.We derive the analytic gradient of the CDF-JS divergence with respect to the non-rigid registration parameters for use in the numerical optimization of the groupwise registration leading a computationally efficient and accurate algorithm. The CDF-JS is symmetric and has no bias toward any of the given point-sets, since there is NO fixed reference data set. Instead, the groupwise registration takes place between the input data sets and an evolving target dubbed the pooled model. This target evolves to a fully registered pooled data set when the CDF-JS defined over this pooled data is minimized. Our algorithm is especially useful for creating atlases of various shapes (represented as point distribution models) as well as for simultaneously registering 3D range data sets without establishing any correspondence. We present experimental results on non-rigid registration of 2D/3D real point set data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2006.131

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Groupwise registration techniques have been developed [33], [123] which are typically more reliable, and reduce the accumulated errors that arise in pairwise registration.

    “Groupwise registration techniques have been developed [33], [123] which are typically more reliable, and reduce the accumulated errors that arise in pairwise registration.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, F., Vemuri, B. C., & Rangarajan, A.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Venue
2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2006-07-10
Volume
1
Pages
1283-1288
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123761600
Cited by
47
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS046812)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
Keywords
groupwise registration, non-rigid registration, point cloud registration, cumulative distribution function, Jensen-Shannon divergence, point distribution model, 3D range data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review