Cited by 4,577Complexity and Algorithms in GraphsMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Vision and Imaging

An experimental comparison of min-cut/max- flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision

Boykov, Y., Kolmogorov, V.·2004·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

After [15], [31], [19], [8], [25], [5], minimum cut/maximum flow algorithms on graphs emerged as an increasingly useful tool for exact or approximate energy minimization in low-level vision. The combinatorial optimization literature provides many min-cut/max-flow algorithms with different polynomial time complexity. Their practical efficiency, however, has to date been studied mainly outside the scope of computer vision. The goal of this paper is to provide an experimental comparison of the efficiency of min-cut/max flow algorithms for applications in vision. We compare the running times of several standard algorithms, as well as a new algorithm that we have recently developed. The algorithms we study include both Goldberg-Tarjan style "push-relabel" methods and algorithms based on Ford-Fulkerson style "augmenting paths." We benchmark these algorithms on a number of typical graphs in the contexts of image restoration, stereo, and segmentation. In many cases, our new algorithm works several times faster than any of the other methods, making near real-time performance possible. An implementation of our max-flow/min-cut algorithm is available upon request for research purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2004.60

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22][22] V. Kolmogorov, ' Graph-Based Algorithms for Multi-Camera Reconstruction Problem,' PhD thesis, Computer Science Dept., Cornell Univ., 2003. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boykov, Y., & Kolmogorov, V.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2004-09
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1124-1137
ISSN
0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113137767
Cited by
4,577
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 177 · 2019: 221 · 2018: 248 · 2017: 284 · 2016: 315 · 2015: 360 · 2014: 354 · 2013: 362 · 2012: 330
FWCI
100.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Tsukuba
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
energy minimization, graph cuts, augmenting paths, algorithm benchmarking, image restoration, stereo matching, image segmentation, low-level vision, real-time performance
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Energy Transfer, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Photogrammetry, Photography, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Cluster Analysis, Information Storage and Retrieval, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review