Cited by 223D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFace recognition and analysisMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Efficient groupwise non-rigid registration of textured surfaces

Sidorov, Kirill A., Richmond, Stephen, Marshall, David·2011·CVPR 2011

Abstract

Advances in 3D imaging have recently made 3D surface scanners, capable of capturing textured surfaces at video rate, affordable and common in computer vision. This is a relatively new source of data, the potential of which has not yet been fully exploited as the problem of non-rigid registration of surfaces is difficult. While registration based on shape alone has been an active research area for some time, the problem of registering surfaces based on texture information has not been addressed in a principled way. We propose a novel, efficient and reliable, fully automatic method for performing groupwise non-rigid registration of textured surfaces, such as those obtained with 3D scanners. We demonstrate the robustness of our approach on 3D scans of human faces, including the notoriously difficult case of inter-subject registration. We show how our method can be used to build high-quality 3D models of appearance fully automatically.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995632

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As has been found in medical imaging, registration utilizing heterogeneous information (e.g. geometry and texture [41], [120]) may give higher accuracy.

    “As has been found in medical imaging, registration utilizing heterogeneous information (e.g.geometry and texture [41], [120]) may give higher accuracy.”
  • The minimum description length criterion is well-known for determining the best model from data; it has been used in image registration [119], face (texture and depth) registration [120] and medical data registration [121] in computer vision, but is relatively little used in computer graphics and shape analysis.

    “In information theory, the minimum description length criterion is well-known for determining the best model from data; it has been used in image registration [119], face (texture and depth) registration [120] and medical data registration [121] in computer vision, but is relatively little used in computer graphics and shape analysis.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sidorov, K. A., Richmond, S., & Marshall, D.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
CVPR 2011
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-06
Pages
2401-2408
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052504501
Cited by
22
References
20
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
groupwise registration, non-rigid registration, textured surfaces, 3D surface scanning, 3D face scans, inter-subject registration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review