The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A non-local cost aggregation method for stereo matching
Abstract
Matching cost aggregation is one of the oldest and still popular methods for stereo correspondence. While effective and efficient, cost aggregation methods typically aggregate the matching cost by summing/averaging over a user-specified, local support region. This is obviously only locally-optimal, and the computational complexity of the full-kernel implementation usually depends on the region size. In this paper, the cost aggregation problem is re-examined and a non-local solution is proposed. The matching cost values are aggregated adaptively based on pixel similarity on a tree structure derived from the stereo image pair to preserve depth edges. The nodes of this tree are all the image pixels, and the edges are all the edges between the nearest neighboring pixels. The similarity between any two pixels is decided by their shortest distance on the tree. The proposed method is non-local as every node receives supports from all other nodes on the tree. As can be expected, the proposed non-local solution outperforms all local cost aggregation methods on the standard (Middlebury) benchmark. Besides, it has great advantage in extremely low computational complexity: only a total of 2 addition/subtraction operations and 3 multiplication operations are required for each pixel at each disparity level. It is very close to the complexity of unnormalized box filtering using integral image which requires 6 addition/subtraction operations. Unnormalized box filter is the fastest local cost aggregation method but blurs across depth edges. The proposed method was tested on a MacBook Air laptop computer with a 1.8 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU and 4 GB memory. The average runtime on the Middlebury data sets is about 90 milliseconds, and is only about 1.25× slower than unnormalized box filter. A non-local disparity refinement method is also proposed based on the non-local cost aggregation method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robust Real-Time Face Detection
Viola, P., & Jones, M. J. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000013087.49260.fb · Cited by 14,097
Bilateral Filtering for Gray and Color Images
Tomasi, C., & Manduchi, R. (2002) · Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271) · doi:10.1109/iccv.1998.710815 · Cited by 8,177 · cited 1×
“Yoon and Kweon [6] demonstrated that edge-aware filters like bilateral filter [22] are very effective for preserving depth edges and Yang et al.”
BackgroundFast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms
Scharstein, D., & Szeliski, R. (2002) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1014573219977 · Cited by 6,740
He, K., Sun, J., & Tang, X. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15549-9_1 · Cited by 1,565
Freeman, W. T., Pasztor, E. C., & Carmichael, O. T. (2000) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1026501619075 · Cited by 1,459
Stereo matching using belief propagation
Sun, J., Zheng, N.-N., & Shum, H.-Y. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1206509 · Cited by 1,271
Adaptive support-weight approach for correspondence search
Yoon, K.-J., & Kweon, I. S. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.70 · Cited by 1,194
Summed-area tables for texture mapping
Crow, F. C. (1984) · Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/800031.808600 · Cited by 1,125
A Fast Approximation of the Bilateral Filter Using a Signal Processing Approach
Paris, S., & Durand, F. (2009) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0110-8 · Cited by 797
Cited by
Recurrent MVSNet for High-Resolution Multi-View Stereo Depth Inference
Yao, Y., Luo, Z., Li, S., Shen, T., Fang, T., & Quan, L. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00567 · Cited by 666
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Q.
- Venue
- 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-06
- Pages
- 1402-1409
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039580825
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 28.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A non-local cost aggregation method for stereo matching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247827
- The paper
- Yang, Q. (2012). A non-local cost aggregation method for stereo matching. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.