Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 364

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A non-local cost aggregation method for stereo matching

Qingxiong Yang·2012·2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Matching cost aggregation is one of the oldest and still popular methods for stereo correspondence. While effective and efficient, cost aggregation methods typically aggregate the matching cost by summing/averaging over a user-specified, local support region. This is obviously only locally-optimal, and the computational complexity of the full-kernel implementation usually depends on the region size. In this paper, the cost aggregation problem is re-examined and a non-local solution is proposed. The matching cost values are aggregated adaptively based on pixel similarity on a tree structure derived from the stereo image pair to preserve depth edges. The nodes of this tree are all the image pixels, and the edges are all the edges between the nearest neighboring pixels. The similarity between any two pixels is decided by their shortest distance on the tree. The proposed method is non-local as every node receives supports from all other nodes on the tree. As can be expected, the proposed non-local solution outperforms all local cost aggregation methods on the standard (Middlebury) benchmark. Besides, it has great advantage in extremely low computational complexity: only a total of 2 addition/subtraction operations and 3 multiplication operations are required for each pixel at each disparity level. It is very close to the complexity of unnormalized box filtering using integral image which requires 6 addition/subtraction operations. Unnormalized box filter is the fastest local cost aggregation method but blurs across depth edges. The proposed method was tested on a MacBook Air laptop computer with a 1.8 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU and 4 GB memory. The average runtime on the Middlebury data sets is about 90 milliseconds, and is only about 1.25× slower than unnormalized box filter. A non-local disparity refinement method is also proposed based on the non-local cost aggregation method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247827

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Yang, Q.
Venue
2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-06
Pages
1402-1409
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039580825
Cited by
364
References
22
FWCI
28.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A non-local cost aggregation method for stereo matching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247827
The paper
Yang, Q. (2012). A non-local cost aggregation method for stereo matching. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247827

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.