Cited by 59Advanced Vision and ImagingOptical measurement and interference techniques3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

Critical Configurations for Radial Distortion Self-Calibration

Wu, Changchang·2014·2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

In this paper, we study the configurations of motion and structure that lead to inherent ambiguities in radial distortion estimation (or 3D reconstruction with unknown radial distortions). By analyzing the motion field of radially distorted images, we solve for critical surface pairs that can lead to the same motion field under different radial distortions and possibly different camera motions. We study the properties of the discovered critical configurations and discuss the practically important configurations that often occur in real applications. We demonstrate the impact of the radial distortion ambiguity on multi-view reconstruction with synthetic experiments and real experiments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2014.11

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A variety of inappropriate camera motions or environmental geometries can result in critical configurations which cannot be resolved by existing optimization schemes.

    “Last but not least, a variety of inappropriate camera motions or environmental geometries can result in so-called critical configurations which cannot be resolved by the existing optimization schemes122.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [122]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, C.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Changchang
Venue
2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-06
Pages
25-32
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102000110
Cited by
59
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Optical measurement and interference techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
radial distortion, self-calibration, critical configurations, ambiguity, 3D reconstruction, multi-view reconstruction, camera movement, motion field

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review