Learning Expressionlets on Spatio-temporal Manifold for Dynamic Facial Expression Recognition
Abstract
Facial expression is temporally dynamic event which can be decomposed into a set of muscle motions occurring in different facial regions over various time intervals. For dynamic expression recognition, two key issues, temporal alignment and semantics-aware dynamic representation, must be taken into account. In this paper, we attempt to solve both problems via manifold modeling of videos based on a novel mid-level representation, i.e. expressionlet. Specifically, our method contains three key components: 1) each expression video clip is modeled as a spatio-temporal manifold (STM) formed by dense low-level features, 2) a Universal Manifold Model (UMM) is learned over all low-level features and represented as a set of local ST modes to statistically unify all the STMs. 3) the local modes on each STM can be instantiated by fitting to UMM, and the corresponding expressionlet is constructed by modeling the variations in each local ST mode. With above strategy, expression videos are naturally aligned both spatially and temporally. To enhance the discriminative power, the expressionlet-based STM representation is further processed with discriminant embedding. Our method is evaluated on four public expression databases, CK+, MMI, Oulu-CASIA, and AFEW. In all cases, our method reports results better than the known state-of-the-art.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous FER methods treat the texture or landmark modality independently, using only one modality for FER.
“Mostly, all previous work treats the texture or landmark modality independently, where only the texture or landmark modality is employed for FER.”
From Multimodal learning for facial expression recognition (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
Automatic analysis of facial expressions: the state of the art
Pantie, M., & Rothkrantz, L. J. M. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.895976 · Cited by 1,778 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Early research mostly focused on expression analysis from static facial images [20].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Joint Fine-Tuning in Deep Neural Networks for Facial Expression Recognition
Jung, H., Lee, S., Yim, J., Park, S., & Kim, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.341 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Corneanu, C. A., Simon, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2515606 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
FaceNet2ExpNet: Regularizing a Deep Face Recognition Net for Expression Recognition
Ding, H., Zhou, S. K., & Chellappa, R. (2017) · 2017 12th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2017) · doi:10.1109/fg.2017.23 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Deep Pain: Exploiting Long Short-Term Memory Networks for Facial Expression Classification
Rodriguez, P., Cucurull, G., Gonzalez, J., Gonfaus, J. M., Nasrollahi, K., Moeslund, T. B., & Roca, F. X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2017.2662199 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
AFEW-VA database for valence and arousal estimation in-the-wild
Kossaifi, J., Tzimiropoulos, G., Todorovic, S., & Pantic, M. (2017) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2017.02.001 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Spatio-temporal convolutional features with nested LSTM for facial expression recognition
Yu, Z., Liu, G., Liu, Q., & Deng, J. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.07.028 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Multimodal learning for facial expression recognition
Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Ma, L., Guan, J., & Gong, S. (2015) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2015.04.012 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Walecki, R., Rudovic, O., Pavlovic, V., & Pantic, M. (2015) · 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG) · doi:10.1109/fg.2015.7163137 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, M., Shan, S., Wang, R., & Chen, X.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-06
- Pages
- 1749-1756
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134860945
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 16.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Keywords
- dynamic facial expression recognition, manifold learning, temporal alignment, mid-level representation, video representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review