Cited by 392Face and Expression RecognitionEmotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysis

Learning Expressionlets on Spatio-temporal Manifold for Dynamic Facial Expression Recognition

Liu, Mengyi, Shan, Shiguang, Wang, Ruiping, Chen, Xilin·2014·2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Facial expression is temporally dynamic event which can be decomposed into a set of muscle motions occurring in different facial regions over various time intervals. For dynamic expression recognition, two key issues, temporal alignment and semantics-aware dynamic representation, must be taken into account. In this paper, we attempt to solve both problems via manifold modeling of videos based on a novel mid-level representation, i.e. expressionlet. Specifically, our method contains three key components: 1) each expression video clip is modeled as a spatio-temporal manifold (STM) formed by dense low-level features, 2) a Universal Manifold Model (UMM) is learned over all low-level features and represented as a set of local ST modes to statistically unify all the STMs. 3) the local modes on each STM can be instantiated by fitting to UMM, and the corresponding expressionlet is constructed by modeling the variations in each local ST mode. With above strategy, expression videos are naturally aligned both spatially and temporally. To enhance the discriminative power, the expressionlet-based STM representation is further processed with discriminant embedding. Our method is evaluated on four public expression databases, CK+, MMI, Oulu-CASIA, and AFEW. In all cases, our method reports results better than the known state-of-the-art.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2014.226

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous FER methods treat the texture or landmark modality independently, using only one modality for FER.

    “Mostly, all previous work treats the texture or landmark modality independently, where only the texture or landmark modality is employed for FER.”

    From Multimodal learning for facial expression recognition (2015) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, M., Shan, S., Wang, R., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-06
Pages
1749-1756
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134860945
Cited by
392
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 3
FWCI
16.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
dynamic facial expression recognition, manifold learning, temporal alignment, mid-level representation, video representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review