Cited by 781Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisFace and Expression Recognition

Joint Fine-Tuning in Deep Neural Networks for Facial Expression Recognition

Jung, Heechul, Lee, Sihaeng, Yim, Junho, Park, Sunjeong, Kim, Junmo·2015·2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Temporal information has useful features for recognizing facial expressions. However, to manually design useful features requires a lot of effort. In this paper, to reduce this effort, a deep learning technique, which is regarded as a tool to automatically extract useful features from raw data, is adopted. Our deep network is based on two different models. The first deep network extracts temporal appearance features from image sequences, while the other deep network extracts temporal geometry features from temporal facial landmark points. These two models are combined using a new integration method in order to boost the performance of the facial expression recognition. Through several experiments, we show that the two models cooperate with each other. As a result, we achieve superior performance to other state-of-the-art methods in the CK+ and Oulu-CASIA databases. Furthermore, we show that our new integration method gives more accurate results than traditional methods, such as a weighted summation and a feature concatenation method.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2015.341

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In benchmarking experiments across various datasets, many studies found that features extracted with CNNs lead to higher recognition accuracies than handcrafted features.

    “In benchmarking experiments across various datasets, many studies found that features extracted with CNNs lead to higher recognition accuracies than handcrafted features (e.g., [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [64], [92], [93], [94]).”
  • Data augmentation artificially increases the number of available examples or training epochs by a factor typically between 10 and 30, and up to 300.

    “This way, researchers artificially increase the number of available examples or training epochs by a factor typically between 10 and 30 [88], [113], [114], and up to 300 [115].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jung, H., Lee, S., Yim, J., Park, S., & Kim, J.
Affiliations
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Venue
2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-12
Pages
2983-2991
OpenAlex
W2217426128
Cited by
781
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 15
FWCI
72.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • KAIST Institutional Repository (KAIST) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial expression recognition, joint fine-tuning, facial landmarks, feature integration, image sequences, deep neural network, CK+ database

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review