The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Image
Open accessAbstract
Generation of 3D data by deep neural networks has been attracting increasing attention in the research community. The majority of extant works resort to regular representations such as volumetric grids or collections of images; however, these representations obscure the natural invariance of 3D shapes under geometric transformations, and also suffer from a number of other issues. In this paper we address the problem of 3D reconstruction from a single image, generating a straight-forward form of output - point cloud coordinates. Along with this problem arises a unique and interesting issue, that the groundtruth shape for an input image may be ambiguous. Driven by this unorthodox output form and the inherent ambiguity in groundtruth, we design architecture, loss function and learning paradigm that are novel and effective. Our final solution is a conditional shape sampler, capable of predicting multiple plausible 3D point clouds from an input image. In experiments not only can our system outperform state-of-the-art methods on single image based 3d reconstruction benchmarks; but it also shows strong performance for 3D shape completion and promising ability in making multiple plausible predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets
Mirza, M., & Osindero, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1784 · Cited by 8,863
Stacked Hourglass Networks for Human Pose Estimation
Newell, A., Yang, K., & Deng, J. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46484-8_29 · Cited by 5,634
Visual simultaneous localization and mapping: a survey
Fuentes-Pacheco, J., Ruiz-Ascencio, J., & Rendón-Mancha, J. M. (2015) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-012-9365-8 · Cited by 883
Hoiem, D., Efros, A. A., & Hebert, M. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1073204.1073232 · Cited by 616
Cited by
Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Clouds
Wang, Y., Sun, Y., Liu, Z., Sarma, S. E., Bronstein, M. M., & Solomon, J. M. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/3326362 · Cited by 7,199
Social GAN: Socially Acceptable Trajectories with Generative Adversarial Networks
Gupta, A., Johnson, J., Fei-Fei, L., Savarese, S., & Alahi, A. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00240 · Cited by 2,466
FoldingNet: Point Cloud Auto-Encoder via Deep Grid Deformation
Yang, Y., Feng, C., Shen, Y., & Tian, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00029 · Cited by 1,313
Deep Hough Voting for 3D Object Detection in Point Clouds
Qi, C. R., Litany, O., He, K., & Guibas, L. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00937 · Cited by 1,244
Self-citationKato, H., Ushiku, Y., & Harada, T. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00411 · Cited by 954
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, H., Su, H., & Guibas, L.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-07
- Pages
- 2463-2471
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2560722161
- Cited by
- 2,402
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 267.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Image. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2017.264
- The paper
- Fan, H., Su, H., & Guibas, L. (2017). A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Image. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2017.264
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.