Cited by 3813D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFace recognition and analysisImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction

3D Menagerie: Modeling the 3D Shape and Pose of Animals

Zuffi, Silvia, Kanazawa, Angjoo, Jacobs, David W., Black, Michael J.·2017·2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

There has been significant work on learning realistic, articulated, 3D models of the human body. In contrast, there are few such models of animals, despite many applications. The main challenge is that animals are much less cooperative than humans. The best human body models are learned from thousands of 3D scans of people in specific poses, which is infeasible with live animals. Consequently, we learn our model from a small set of 3D scans of toy figurines in arbitrary poses. We employ a novel part-based shape model to compute an initial registration to the scans. We then normalize their pose, learn a statistical shape model, and refine the registrations and the model together. In this way, we accurately align animal scans from different quadruped families with very different shapes and poses. With the registration to a common template we learn a shape space representing animals including lions, cats, dogs, horses, cows and hippos. Animal shapes can be sampled from the model, posed, animated, and fit to data. We demonstrate generalization by fitting it to images of real animals including species not seen in training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2017.586

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent work defines the SMAL model, a 3D articulated shape model for a set of quadruped families.

    “Recent work defines the SMAL (Skinned Multi-Animal Linear) model, a 3D articulated shape model for a set of quadruped families107.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [107]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zuffi, S., Kanazawa, A., Jacobs, D. W., & Black, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche (IT)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems (DE)
Venue
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
5524-5532
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2555859288
Cited by
381
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
24.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Keywords
statistical shape models, pose normalization, animal pose estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review