The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generative Face Completion
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we propose an effective face completion algorithm using a deep generative model. Different from well-studied background completion, the face completion task is more challenging as it often requires to generate semantically new pixels for the missing key components (e.g., eyes and mouths) that contain large appearance variations. Unlike existing nonparametric algorithms that search for patches to synthesize, our algorithm directly generates contents for missing regions based on a neural network. The model is trained with a combination of a reconstruction loss, two adversarial losses and a semantic parsing loss, which ensures pixel faithfulness and local-global contents consistency. With extensive experimental results, we demonstrate qualitatively and quantitatively that our model is able to deal with a large area of missing pixels in arbitrary shapes and generate realistic face completion results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks
Radford, A., Metz, L., & Chintala, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06434 · Cited by 12,235
Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpainting
Pathak, D., Krahenbuhl, P., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Efros, A. A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.278 · Cited by 5,691
Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553380 · Cited by 5,366 · cited 1×
“To effectively train our network, we use the curriculum strategy [3] by gradually increasing the difficulty level and network scale.”
Method
Cited by
Image Inpainting for Irregular Holes Using Partial Convolutions
Liu, G., Reda, F. A., Shih, K. J., Wang, T.-C., Tao, A., & Catanzaro, B. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01252-6_6 · Cited by 2,419
“Li et al. [17] and Iizuka et al. [10] extended Content Encoders by defining both global and local discriminators; then Iizuka et al. [10] apply Poisson blending as a post-process.”
BackgroundDeep Learning in Mobile and Wireless Networking: A Survey
Zhang, C., Patras, P., & Haddadi, H. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2904897 · Cited by 1,768
Occlusion Aware Facial Expression Recognition Using CNN With Attention Mechanism
Li, Y., Zeng, J., Shan, S., & Chen, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2018.2886767 · Cited by 916
Self-citationAttentive Generative Adversarial Network for Raindrop Removal from A Single Image
Qian, R., Tan, R. T., Yang, W., Su, J., & Liu, J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00263 · Cited by 821
Loyola-Gonzalez, O. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2949286 · Cited by 559
FakeCatcher: Detection of Synthetic Portrait Videos using Biological Signals
Ciftci, U. A., Demir, I., & Yin, L. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3009287 · Cited by 499
Durall, R., Keuper, M., & Keuper, J. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00791 · Cited by 26
Atitallah, S. B., Driss, M., Boulila, W., & Ghézala, H. B. (2020) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100303 · Cited by 375
SC-FEGAN: Face Editing Generative Adversarial Network With User’s Sketch and Color
Jo, Y., & Park, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00183 · Cited by 346
Detecting GAN generated Fake Images using Co-occurrence Matrices
Nataraj, L., Mohammed, T. M., Manjunath, B. S., Chandrasekaran, S., Flenner, A., Bappy, J. H., & Roy-Chowdhury, A. K. (2019) · Electronic Imaging · doi:10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2019.5.mwsf-532 · Cited by 331
Generative Adversarial Networks in Computer Vision: A Survey and Taxonomy
Wang, Z., She, Q., & Ward, T. E. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3439723 · Cited by 267
A Survey on an Emerging Area: Deep Learning for Smart City Data
Chen, Q., Wang, W., Wu, F., De, S., Wang, R., Zhang, B., & Huang, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2019.2907718 · Cited by 167
A comprehensive overview of Deepfake: generation, detection, datasets, and opportunities
Seow, J. W., Lim, M. K., Phan, R. C. W., & Liu, J. K. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.135 · Cited by 149
Cascade EF-GAN: Progressive Facial Expression Editing With Local Focuses
Wu, R., Zhang, G., Lu, S., & Chen, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00507 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Liu, S., Yang, J., & Yang, M.-H.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-07
- Pages
- 5892-5900
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2611104282
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
